By: Anupama Mishra,Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India. Email: anupama.mishra@ieee.org

As more and more organizations rely on machine learning algorithms to make critical business decisions, the risk of data poisoning attacks is on the rise. Data poisoning is a type of cyber-attack where an attacker intentionally alters the data used to train a machine learning model to make it produce inaccurate results. In this blog post, we will explore the threat of data poisoning attacks, their impact, and how organizations can defend against them.

Understanding Data Poisoning Attacks

Data poisoning attacks are a type of attack that targets the data used to train machine learning models. An attacker can alter the training data in various ways, such as injecting false data, modifying existing data, or manipulating the weighting of specific data points. These alterations can cause the machine learning model to produce inaccurate results, leading to incorrect decisions and potential financial losses.

Impact of Data Poisoning Attacks

The impact of a data poisoning attack can be severe, particularly for organizations that rely heavily on machine learning algorithms to make critical business decisions. For example, a data poisoning attack in the financial industry could lead to inaccurate credit risk assessments or fraudulent transactions. In the healthcare industry, a data poisoning attack could result in misdiagnosis or incorrect medical treatments. The impact can be far-reaching, affecting an organization’s reputation and financial stability.

Defending Against Data Poisoning Attacks

Defending against data poisoning attacks requires a multi-faceted approach involving technical and procedural measures. Here are some steps that organizations can take to protect against data poisoning attacks:

1. Data Quality Assurance: Organizations must ensure that the data used to train machine learning models is accurate, complete, and representative of the problem being solved.
2. Data Monitoring and Auditing: Organizations must monitor and audit the data used to train machine learning models to detect anomalies or suspicious activity.
3. Model Validation: Organizations must validate the performance of machine learning models regularly to ensure that they produce accurate results.
4. Threat Intelligence: Organizations must stay up-to-date on the latest threats and vulnerabilities in the machine learning ecosystem to identify potential data poisoning attacks.
5. Employee Awareness: Organizations must train their employees on the risks of data poisoning attacks and the steps they can take to prevent them.

Conclusion

Data poisoning attacks are a growing threat to organizations that rely on machine learning algorithms to make critical business decisions. These attacks can have severe consequences, including financial losses and reputational damage. Defending against data poisoning attacks requires a multi-faceted approach that involves data quality assurance, data monitoring and auditing, model validation, threat intelligence, and employee awareness. Organizations must prioritize the security of their machine learning models to prevent data poisoning attacks and ensure accurate decision-making.

Refernces

1. Steinhardt, J., Koh, P. W. W., & Liang, P. S. (2017). Certified defenses for data poisoning attacks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 30.
2. Wang, Y., & Chaudhuri, K. (2018). Data poisoning attacks against online learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1808.08994.
3. Zhang, X., Zhu, X., & Lessard, L. (2020, July). Online data poisoning attacks. In Learning for Dynamics and Control (pp. 201-210). PMLR.
4. Ren, P., et al., (2021). A survey of deep active learning. ACM computing surveys (CSUR), 54(9), 1-40.
5. Chen, X., Liu, C., Li, B., Lu, K., & Song, D. (2017). Targeted backdoor attacks on deep learning systems using data poisoning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.05526.
6. Cvitić, I., et al., (2021). Boosting-based DDoS detection in internet of things systems. IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 9(3), 2109-2123.
7. Huang, W. R., Geiping, J., Fowl, L., Taylor, G., & Goldstein, T. (2020). Metapoison: Practical general-purpose clean-label data poisoning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 12080-12091.
8. Lv, L., et al., (2022). An edge-AI based forecasting approach for improving smart microgrid efficiency. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.
9. Xiao, H., Biggio, B., Brown, G., Fumera, G., Eckert, C., & Roli, F. (2015, June). Is feature selection secure against training data poisoning?. In international conference on machine learning (pp. 1689-1698). PMLR.
10. Stergiou, C. L., Psannis, K. E., & Gupta, B. B. (2021). InFeMo: flexible big data management through a federated cloud system. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 22(2), 1-22.
11. Tolpegin, V., Truex, S., Gursoy, M. E., & Liu, L. (2020). Data poisoning attacks against federated learning systems. In Computer Security–ESORICS 2020: 25th European Symposium on Research in Computer Security, ESORICS 2020, Guildford, UK, September 14–18, 2020, Proceedings, Part I 25 (pp. 480-501). Springer International Publishing.
12. Zhang, J., et al., (2021). A secure decentralized spatial crowdsourcing scheme for 6G-enabled network in box. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(9), 6160-6170.
13. Shankar, K., et al., (2021). Synergic deep learning for smart health diagnosis of COVID-19 for connected living and smart cities. ACM Transactions on Internet Technology (TOIT), 22(3), 1-14.
14. Alfeld, S., Zhu, X., & Barford, P. (2016, February). Data poisoning attacks against autoregressive models. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol. 30, No. 1).
15. Prathiba, S. B., (2021). SDN-assisted safety message dissemination framework for vehicular critical energy infrastructure. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(5), 3510-3518.
16. Li, B., (2016). Data poisoning attacks on factorization-based collaborative filtering. Advances in neural information processing systems, 29.
17. Gaurav, A., et al.,(2022). A comprehensive survey on machine learning approaches for malware detection in IoT-based enterprise information system. Enterprise Information Systems, 1-25.
18. Yang, Y., Liu, T. Y., & Mirzasoleiman, B. (2022, June). Not all poisons are created equal: Robust training against data poisoning. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 25154-25165). PMLR.
19. Almomani, A., et al., (2022). Phishing Website Detection With Semantic Features Based on Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comparative Study. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 18(1), 1-24.
20. Wang, Y., Mianjy, P., & Arora, R. (2021, July). Robust learning for data poisoning attacks. In International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 10859-10869). PMLR.
21. Singh, A., et al., (2022). Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) Attacks and Defense Mechanisms in Various Web-Enabled Computing Platforms: Issues, Challenges, and Future Research Directions. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems (IJSWIS), 18(1), 1-43.

Cite As

A. Mishra (2023) Data Poisoning Attack: Understanding the Threat and Defending Against It, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

491100cookie-checkData Poisoning Attack: Understanding the Threat and Defending Against Ityes