Space Cyber Defense: Safeguarding Digital Space Assets

By: Achit Katiyar1

1 International Center for AI and Cyber Security Research and Innovations (CCRI), Asia University, Taiwan achitktr@gmail.com

Abstract: While space technologies progress and fuse with critical systems on Earth, the level of threat connected to space systems increases intensely. Space cyber defense is a new specialty that is devoted to protecting information in satellite and space exploration missions and other space-based resources from cyber-attacks. This paper explores, the problems associated with space environment, the current and available defensive approaches to meeting cybersecurity in space.

Introduction: Space cyber defense is a relatively new scientific domain of study dealing with threats to space systems from cyber security issues, which highlights the tendency of space servicing provision. In the case of space assets, cybersecurity and space security challenges are intertwined aspects for protection and management of digital technologies.

  • Cybersecurity Risks in Space:
  • Space systems are most vulnerable to cyber targets because they support the majority of international telecommunication and economics [1].
  • Recent events demonstrate the importance of effective proactive cyber protection systems for continued mission accomplishment [1].
  • Active Defense Mechanisms:
  • Such notions as ‘hacking back’ or active defense are mentioned as measures against cyber threats by installing cyber decoys to respond to cyber threats on their own [2].
  • They are intended to guarantee that only the attacker is affected because the proportionate response to the cyber event is critical [2].

Challenges in Space Cyber Defense

Cyber threats and risks bracketing space are manifold and emerging from the rapid dependence on space systems for key infrastructural utility and susceptibilities that space cyber defense has. It is important to fully hold these challenges that accompany new developments because it makes it possible to design better mitigation measures.

  • Cyber vulnerabilities of Satellites:
  • Satellites are susceptible to various cyber threats, including unauthorized access and data manipulation, which can compromise their operational integrity [3].
  • Because of the essential function of satellites, their insecurity results from weak protection mechanisms that malicious performers take advantage of [4].
  • Limitations in the detection and response to the threat:
  • In the context of the relation between space and cyberspace, the relationship raises new and specific security issues, as new technologies create new threats [5].
  • Interference with information exchange and hacking of less secure connections are typical attacks [1]
  • Active Defense Mechanisms:
  • Proactive measures such as improved encryption, secure communication channels, and the implementation of intrusion detection systems are vital for enhancing satellite resilience [3], [4].
  • New ideas such as deploying cyber decoys for active defense can offer a ‘how to’ in a pre-emptive strike without unnecessary damages [2].

Certainly, these threats are not minor issues, but the threats mentioned above are complemented by emerging opportunities for the development of new mechanisms of space security and creation of new policies to protect space-based cyber threats.

Cyber Threats to Space Systems

As space systems continue to become more integrated into the infrastructural fabric of the world, cyber threats to these systems are a growing worry. These threats include anything from satellite hacking to signal jamming and are made worse by the use of commercial technologies. Recognizing these threats is critical for identifying suitability strategies of protection.

Figure 1: Cyber threats to space systems [6]

  • Types of Cyber Threats:
  • Satellite Hacking: Some of the many disruptions include: The ROSAT satellite that hackers took control in 1998 [7].
  • Signal Jamming and Spoofing: These tactics are common and might affect communication and other navigational networks that are important for both military and civil applications [8], [9].
  • Legal and strategic implications:
  • International Law: These questions of utilization of international law in cyberspace illustrate how much more work needs to be done in this regard: the legal principles previously effective for space systems have not been designed to cope with contemporary cyber threats [10].
  • Military Restructuring: They are now adapting their defensive strategies to these threats through embracing some new characteristics like quantum computing [11].
  • Emerging technologies:
  • Quantum Technology: This emerging area seems to be critical for creating adaptive safeguards against cyber threats, capable of countering cyber operations of both, nations and non-state performers [11].

As useful as it is to focus on cyber threat, we also need to think about the kinetic conflicts in space because tensions may grow and the shared threats from space debris exist. This duality is evident in the current positioning of space system security in a world facing new challenges in space.

Strategies for Space Cyber Defences

The strategies on cyber defense of space must be sought since satellites are services that are increasingly used as targets by individuals that intend to commit cyber-criminal activities. It can therefore be argued, that the problem of defense mechanisms is dual: the security concerns presented by the environment of cyberspace and the physical security of space assets.

  • Active Defense Mechanisms:
  • Hacking Back: This strategy entails putting in cyber traps that, initiate actions in response to the attack and inflict harm only on the attacker thus the proportionate response concept [2].
  • Deterrence Strategies: Applying denial and punishment measures will improve cyber security by making attacks technologically impossible and economically unprofitable for offenders. Enduring and reliable satellite services cannot be taken for granted, and hence there is a need to practice top cyber defense to counter cyber threats [12]. A graphic defense paradigm also has to take into account both the challenges of cyber that are more universal in the digital domain and protection of the physical assets in the spatial dimension [13].
  • Network Resilience:
  • Topology Analysis: At the same time, knowledge of topologies of satellite networks helps the defenders to choose the routes and avoid excessive latency during an attack, which will help to increase stability in general [14].
  • Cyber-Physical Systems: The nature of space systems requires counter responses for both cyber and physical threats which will guarantee space system protection [15].

However, these strategies are still effective, and with expanding new threats and interdependence between space and cyberspace, many issues have yet to be resolved every time and focus on international cooperation [16].

Conclusion

With human occupancy of space increasing, so do the threats in the realm of space cyber defense. Preserving the keenness of space-based resources, it is essential to control access to the digital resources required for satellites control, space missions, and other critical systems. With the help of features like encryption, artificial intelligence, redundant systems and international collaboration, the concept of space cyber defense is likely to grow into a major element of the future space mission.

References

  1. A. Adelsbach, T. Schaefer, and G. Tountas, “Chapter 2 New Space Architectures – Connectivity and Cyber Security,” Brill, 2023. doi: 10.1163/9789004527270_003.
  2. J. Hsu and G. Falco, “Space Booby Traps: Hacking Back and Assured Cyber Deterrence in Space,” in 2023 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA), Jun. 2023, pp. 115–118. doi: 10.1109/ICAA58325.2023.00024.
  3. “Satellite Cyber Vulnerabilities: An In-depth Analysis,” Int. J. Food Nutr. Sci., vol. 09, no. 03, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.48047/IJFANS/09/03/31.
  4. J. P. Thebarge, W. Henry, and G. Falco, “Developing Scenarios Supporting Space-based IDS,” in ASCEND 2022, in ASCEND. , American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2022. doi: 10.2514/6.2022-4219.
  5. V. Varadharajan and N. Suri, “Security challenges when space merges with cyberspace,” Space Policy, vol. 67, p. 101600, Feb. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.spacepol.2023.101600.
  6. “Why Space Cyber?” Accessed: Sep. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.buffalo.edu/space-cybersecurity/center/why-space-cyber.html
  7. “HACK: a Holistic modeling Approach for Cubesat cyberattacKs”, Accessed: Sep. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://mrforum.com/product/9781644902677-41/
  8. P. Lin, K. Abney, B. DeBruhl, K. Abercromby, H. Danielson, and R. Jenkins, “Outer Space Cyberattacks: Generating Novel Scenarios to Avoid Surprise,” Jun. 17, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2406.12041. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.12041.
  9. R. Peled, E. Aizikovich, E. Habler, Y. Elovici, and A. Shabtai, “Evaluating the Security of Satellite Systems,” Dec. 03, 2023, arXiv: arXiv:2312.01330. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.01330.
  10. B. Bace, Y. Gökce, and U. Tatar, “Law in orbit: International legal perspectives on cyberattacks targeting space systems,” Telecommun. Policy, vol. 48, no. 4, p. 102739, May 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2024.102739.
  11. D. Raghuvanshi and S. Kumar, “Cyber and quantum threats to space systems – A study of the restructuring of a modern armed forces,” Comp. Strategy, vol. 43, no. 3, pp. 206–222, May 2024, doi: 10.1080/01495933.2024.2340949.
  12. “AI Safety and Security: Computer Science & IT Book Chapter | IGI Global.” Accessed: Oct. 04, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.igi-global.com/chapter/ai-safety-and-security/354401
  13. A. Anjum, “SECURITISATION OF CYBER SPACE – FROM PRISM OF DETERRENCE STRATEGY”, Accessed: Sep. 25, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.authorea.com/doi/full/10.36227/techrxiv.23936232.v1?commit=07e80656c1cb3c7f601d2ed0672bcb002847b66f
  14. Y. Cui, Z. Xi, and X. Zhang, “A Game Between Cyber Attack and Defense Under the Topology of Satellite Networks,” in Advances in Guidance, Navigation and Control, L. Yan, H. Duan, and Y. Deng, Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature, 2023, pp. 5113–5125. doi: 10.1007/978-981-19-6613-2_494.
  15. K. Thangavel, J. J. Plotnek, A. Gardi, and R. Sabatini, “Understanding and investigating adversary threats and countermeasures in the context of space cybersecurity,” in 2022 IEEE/AIAA 41st Digital Avionics Systems Conference (DASC), Sep. 2022, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1109/DASC55683.2022.9925759.
  16. R. Kesavamoorthy and P. Karthikeyan, “Cyberspace and Outer Space Security and Mitigation Strategies,” in Cyber Space and Outer Space Security, River Publishers, 2024.
  17. M. Casillo, F. Colace, B. B. Gupta, A. Lorusso, F. Marongiu and D. Santaniello, “Blockchain and NFT: a novel approach to support BIM and Architectural Design,” 2022 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT), Sakheer, Bahrain, 2022, pp. 616-620, doi: 10.1109/3ICT56508.2022.9990815.
  18. P. Chaudhary, B. B. Gupta, K. T. Chui and S. Yamaguchi, “Shielding Smart Home IoT Devices against Adverse Effects of XSS using AI model,” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2021, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICCE50685.2021.9427591.

Cite As

Katiyar A. (2024) Space Cyber Defense: Safeguarding Digital Space Assets, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

79060cookie-checkSpace Cyber Defense: Safeguarding Digital Space Assets
Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.