Data Science and AI: Tools for Predicting Epidemics

By: Poojitha Nagishetti, Department of Computer Science & Engineering (Data Science), Student of Computer Science & Engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology and Science, Angallu(517325), Andhra Pradesh.

Abstract –

Modern AI technology as a subset of data science has created significant changes in different fields, especially in the cases of healthcare and epidemic predictions. Forecasting epidemics, in this context referring to diseases which are easily communicable and widespread, has till date involved using epidemiological models and past records. Nevertheless, data science and AI have added new techniques that allow improving the accuracy and the time of epidemics’ predictions. From this article, a reader can get a broad perspective of the tools and approaches to epidemic prediction in data science and AI. It explains how various forms of data such as prescriptions, medical records, and patient’s history, weather conditions, social networks, and people’s movements patterns contribute to the solution. They range from more conventional and elementary statistical methods to contemporaneous artificial intelligence and neural networks. Examples include the situation with COVID and flu viruses when the details of using these technologies and the advantages are clear. Nevertheless, problems like data quality, model complexity, and the corresponding ethical issues remain unsolved. The last section of the article focuses on the prospects for expanding the calculation of epidemic risks and the development of response measures based on multimodal data, real-time analysis, and the possibility of explaining the results of AI calculations. Thus, by discussing both achievements and difficulties in the case of epidemic prediction and management with the help of data science and AI, this article will present the reader with a clear view of how the field is evolving.

Keywords – Epidemic Prediction, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Data Science, Public Health

Introduction –

Epidemics which are characterized by the occurrence of diseases that spread at a very fast rate affect the health and stability of communities[1]. These outbreaks are undesirable and their effective prediction and containment important to control their impact within the shortest time. Earlier, the epidemic forecasting was done using epidemiological models and statistics as well as past records. However, the advancement of data science and AI create new paradigms in predicting and handling these health emergencies.

Data science uses statistics, computations, and big data analysis to extract information from masses of information[2]. At the same time, such capabilities are complemented by AI, with the help of machine learning and deep learning, which allows the formation of patterns and the subsequent recognition of models based on data. The shifting of epidemic prediction to data science and AI has helped to boost the level of accuracy in forecasting, real time analysis as well as allowance for data type.

The implementation of these technologies aims at the accumulation of large volumes of data, which may be obtained from patients’ medical histories, climatic data, social media activity, and mobility data[3]. Predictive models are then built based on appropriate methods that may range from the simpler statistical

methods to even the more complex techniques of artificial intelligence. The comparability of results between the two models is tested using real-world studies and data, such as the response to the COVID-19 pandemic and Seasonal Influenza epidemics[4], this helps in analysing the effectiveness and shortcomings of these methods effectively.

However, the endeavours have been confronted with some hurdles in the field of epidemic prediction even up to today. Data quality, the use of complex models and ethical questions are still challenging problems that must be solved. This article discusses how the methods of data science and AI are applied in epidemic prediction and it goes deeper in explaining the various tools and methods as well as the cases of its application[5]. In this paper, analysing these aspects will help to provide a clear vision of how these technologies contribute to determining the further evolution of epidemic prediction and the organization of public health. Figure 1 shows the workflow of epidemic prediction.

COVID-19 Pandemic: AI’s Role in Real-Time Tracking and Prediction –

COVID 19 expelled the potential of how AI can be used for epidemic prediction and controlling. At the beginning of the outbreak, artificial intelligence algorithms were used for monitoring, risk estimation, and forecasting of COVID-19 cases[6]. For instance, machine learning algorithms used past trends in contagious diseases, current rates of infection, and people’s movements to predict the spread. Real-life AI applications such as COVID-19 Dashboard by Johns Hopkins University used AI to develop visualizations and analytics for the global case data essential for policymaking. Google health and other models built of machine learning were applied to distinguish chest x-rays and CT scans of the early-stage diagnosis and severity assessment. However, problems like data variability and model generalization were seen which indicated the need to constantly improve and check the AI systems.

Cholera Outbreaks: Predictive Models for Timely Interventions –

AI has also been used in the case of prognosis for the cholera epidemic, especially in the developing countries[7]. These machine learning models involve environmental data of water quality – the Cholera indicators, and the weather data in relation to past cholera cases to help predict future incidences. For instance, a model created for the context of Bangladesh integrated statistics in cholera case incidence history as well as data acquired from satellites into a cholera outbreak prediction model with very high accuracy. Such predictions help recommend the right interventions such as water treatment and vaccination to control the disease from spreading[8]. There are some limitations related to the data coverage and the necessity of tweaking based on the region for a better prediction’s accuracy and dependability.

Influenza Outbreaks: Enhancing Forecast Accuracy with Machine Learning –

Artificial intelligence has hence provided better results in relation to influenza forecasts that exist per season[9]. ARIMA and other ensemble models have been applied in history related flu data, and environmental factors and people’s vaccination rate. For instance, the Flu Sight project is a project of AI, where flu activity in the U. S is determined using data collected through EHRs, and social media platforms. It also helps the agencies that deal with public health forecast future flu seasons and how best the campaign can be done so that the endeavour does not go to waste[10]. However, because newer variations of flu strains and the effects of novel influenza subtype exist, the concept of these predictive models remain a challenge. Table 1 explains the key tools for predicting epidemics.

Table 1: Key Tools for Predicting Epidemics

Tool/Model	Application	Strengths	Challenges
SIR Models	Predicting disease course	Simple, widely used	Assumes homogeneous populations
ARIMA Models	Time-series forecasting	Handles trends and seasonality	Sensitive to outliers
Random Forests	Classification, regression	Reduces overfitting, high accuracy	Computationally intensive
CNNs	Analyzing spatial data	Excellent for image data	Requires large datasets
RNNs/LSTMs	Time-series prediction	Captures temporal dependencies	Computationally intensive
Ensemble Methods	Combining multiple models	Improved accuracy, stability	Requires multiple models
Health Information Systems	Real-time monitoring	Comprehensive, real-time data	Data privacy concerns
Social Media Analytics	Early outbreak detection	Real-time data	Data noise, privacy concerns
GIS	Mapping disease incidence	Spatial insights	Data integration challenges

Tools for Predicting Epidemics –

Such tools and technologies are used in predicting epidemics in line with data science and artificial intelligence in estimations of diseases occurrences and containment measures to such occurrences. Thus, it ranges from basic tools that employ population data and stochastic models to the modern ones that use machine learning methods and real-time analytics tools[3]. Here, we explore some of the key tools used in epidemic prediction. Let it be illustrated here some of the tools employed in the prediction of an epidemic:

1. Statistical Models: Demographic factors have been regarded as having a significant impact on the epidemic. the properties in classical statistical models serve as deep inside these estimates. These models include.

• Susceptible-Infectious-Recovered (SIR) Models: SIR is a typical uncontrolled epidemic model that is mathematically based and contains not less than three compartments for susceptible, infected, and recovered people. It uses differential equations in defining the velocities through which the virus transits from the mentioned states in an endeavour to establish the course of an epidemic.
• Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (ARIMA) Models: ARIMA models are used in time series analysis and so in forecasting which entails using data previously collected in order to forecast for the future. They are most applied to proxy the number of cases or rate of occurrence by employing previous data.

2. Machine Learning Algorithms: We must also appropriate here that because it is very challenging to assess voluminous amounts of data in comparatively short durations of time, machine learning algorithms have recently gained favour as a means of epidemic prediction. Key algorithms include:

• Decision Trees and Random Forests: These algorithms are commonly applied in sorting of data into various classes and applied in the prediction based on the previous trends. Accuracy of a specific decision tree and overfitting of a particular decision tree should increase by averaging via multiple decision trees that is a random forest.
• Support Vector Machines (SVMs): SVMs are used in classification problems such as outbreak prediction which is believed to be precipitated by some factors. It operates in the context of the fact that it aims to determine that hyperplane in the feature space, which would be the most suitable for categorically putting the classes apart from each other.
• K-Nearest Neighbours (KNN): The shortcoming of KNN is useful in solving classification issues in addition to regression tests through comparing record similitude to a certain instance together with the nears labels or the value part.

3. Deep Learning Models: Deep learning models, with their ability to capture complex patterns in data, offer advanced capabilities for epidemic prediction. Since deep learning has the capacities of recognizing complicated patterns in the data and deep understanding of the patterns, it has better prospects of epidemic prognosis.

• Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs): These CNNs are mainly applied in situations whereby there is interaction with the spatial data that includes satellite images or GIS data regarding factors instigating occurrence of the disease.
• Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networks: For instance, daily new infected rate is a time series data and as it involves the rate that includes data from the past which has repetitive patterns which is why RNNs with LSTMs can be used to forecast future incidence rates.

4. Real-Time Monitoring Systems: An example of those systems is the integration of various information sources to show the up-to-date status of disease spread. Real time monitoring systems are made up of several sub systems to arrive at a full system that give real time information on diseases.

• Health Information Systems: Such systems included patient’s EHRs as well as the symptoms, disease-diagnostic and disease-result data whereby such information was used to assess and estimate the commercial consequences on the business.
• Social Media Analytics: On the social media the opinion of the public especially with regards to specific symptoms of certain ailments and/or outbreaks is studied. These inputs are forwarded to NLP tools which outline other initial signs of new breakouts not yet observed in the other conventional analysis instruments.
• Geographic Information Systems (GIS): In the case that GIS is involved in disease mapping as well as environmental factors; climate and population meaning that it provides a view into disease and vital areas.

5. Predictive Analytics Platforms: Predictive analytics platforms combine various tools and algorithms to provide comprehensive epidemic forecasts. Predicting epidemic risks through communication is included in large analysis platforms, which are made up of several applications and models.

• EpiModel: It is an official tool in the R environment and facilitate our concern in simulating as well as estimating epidemic models. This is because it enables the researcher and other stakeholders to work with an intention of improving the capacity of “living through” analysis of the various assumptions of the diseases with the view of ascertaining the extent of spread under the prevailing conditions.
• GAM (Generalized Additive Models): Furthermore since the relations between predictors and outcomes in the model are more intricate and nonlinear the extra DF in the GAMs can capture the epidemiological behaviour appropriately.
• SPLICE (Spatial and Temporal Epidemic Forecasting): Therefore, in the case of diseases, SPLICE either multiplies the space and time variables in the diseases’ prediction or else, with the help of statistical modelling, the GIS aspects are incorporated.

6. Data Integration Tools: Effective epidemic prediction requires the integration of diverse data sources. Certainly, epidemic predictions cannot be based on a single type of data; rather, epidemic predictions should not be made with just the data from one source.

• Data Aggregation Platforms: An integrated platform for receiving information from different sources: records of patients’ conditions, environmental information, and mobility information for analysis and prediction.
• Data Cleaning and Pre-processing Tools: Pre-processing tools for cleaning the data remove any disorders in data given to the models and verify data elements concerning missing statuses.

Conclusion –

Discussing the topic of the paper, it is necessary to state that data science and artificial intelligence are two closely related fields that can serve as enablers that can facilitate the operation of large datasets and contribute to the development of precise prediction of epidemics. These tools range from the simple regression models up to the sophisticated machine learning models plus real-time control system with higher accuracy, continuous time data, and ability to include more data sources. However, in the dimension of data quality, models and model complexity and ethicality, the further development of AI has helped to ceaselessly improve the ability of epidemic early warning and prevention. Subject to the development of these technologies and solving problems already existing in AI, it shall be more important and crucial to forecast the epidemic emergence and enhance the readiness of world health systems.

References –

1. N. C. D. Adhikari et al., “Epidemic Outbreak Prediction Using Artificial Intelligence,” Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 49–64, Aug. 2018, doi: 10.5121/ijcsit.2018.10405.
2. G. Zhang, S. Davoodi, S. S. Band, H. Ghorbani, A. Mosavi, and M. Moslehpour, “A robust approach to pore pressure prediction applying petrophysical log data aided by machine learning techniques,” Energy Rep., vol. 8, pp. 2233–2247, Nov. 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.egyr.2022.01.012.
3. I. Setiawan et al., “Utilizing Random Forest Algorithm for Sentiment Prediction Based on Twitter Data,” 2022, pp. 446–456. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-084-8_37.
4. N. Madhav, B. Oppenheim, M. Gallivan, P. Mulembakani, E. Rubin, and N. Wolfe, “Pandemics: Risks, Impacts, and Mitigation,” in Disease Control Priorities: Improving Health and Reducing Poverty, 3rd ed., D. T. Jamison, H. Gelband, S. Horton, P. Jha, R. Laxminarayan, C. N. Mock, and R. Nugent, Eds., Washington (DC): The International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, 2017. Accessed: Aug. 06, 2024. [Online]. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK525302/
5. S. Lalmuanawma, J. Hussain, and L. Chhakchhuak, “Applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence for Covid-19 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic: A review,” Chaos Solitons Fractals, vol. 139, p. 110059, Oct. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2020.110059.
6. S. Feng, Z. Feng, C. Ling, C. Chang, and Z. Feng, “Prediction of the COVID-19 epidemic trends based on SEIR and AI models,” PLOS ONE, vol. 16, no. 1, p. e0245101, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0245101.
7. T. Haksoro, A. S. Aisjah, Sreerakuvandana, M. Rahaman, and T. R. Biyanto, “Enhancing Techno Economic Efficiency of FTC Distillation Using Cloud-Based Stochastic Algorithm,” Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput. IJCAC, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.4018/IJCAC.332408.
8. M. M. Ogore, K. Nkurikiyeyezu, and J. Nsenga, “Offline Prediction of Cholera in Rural Communal Tap Waters Using Edge AI inference,” in 2021 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps), Dec. 2021, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/GCWkshps52748.2021.9682128.
9. K. Su et al., “Forecasting influenza activity using self-adaptive AI model and multi-source data in Chongqing, China,” eBioMedicine, vol. 47, pp. 284–292, Sep. 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.08.024.
10. M. Rahaman, C.-Y. Lin, P. Pappachan, B. B. Gupta, and C.-H. Hsu, “Privacy-Centric AI and IoT Solutions for Smart Rural Farm Monitoring and Control,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 13, Art. no. 13, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24134157.
11. Sarin, S., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Goyal, S., Gupta, B. B., Arya, V., & Chui, K. T. (2024). SEIR‐driven semantic integration framework: Internet of Things‐enhanced epidemiological surveillance in COVID‐19 outbreaks using recurrent neural networks. IET Cyber‐Physical Systems: Theory & Applications.
12. Chhabra, A., Singh, S. K., Sharma, A., Kumar, S., Gupta, B. B., Arya, V., & Chui, K. T. (2024). Sustainable and intelligent time-series models for epidemic disease forecasting and analysis. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 100064.

Cite As

Nagishetti P. (2024) Data Science and AI: Tools for Predicting Epidemics, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

738700cookie-checkData Science and AI: Tools for Predicting Epidemicsyes