From HTTP/2 to HTTP/1: Potential Security Anomalies

By: Arti Sachan, Insights2Techinfo, U.S

In the world of web protocols, HTTP/2 and HTTP/1 have played significant roles in shaping how data is transmitted over the internet. While HTTP/2 offers performance improvements and enhanced security features, some organizations are still considering the transition back to HTTP/1 due to compatibility and resource constraints. However, this migration comes with potential security implications that need careful consideration. In this blog, we will explore the security risks associated with moving from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1 and discuss best practices to ensure a smooth and secure transition.

Understanding HTTP/2 and HTTP/1 Protocols

HTTP/2 is a more modern and efficient protocol designed to overcome the limitations of HTTP/1. It introduces features like multiplexing, header compression, and server push, resulting in faster load times and reduced latency. On the other hand, HTTP/1, being the older version, lacks these performance optimizations but has proven compatibility with legacy systems and browsers.

Table 1: Comparison of HTTP/2 and HTTP/1 Features

Header CompressionYesNo
Server PushYesNo
Binary FramingYesNo
Request PrioritizationYesNo
Upgrade Over TLSYesNo
Connection ReuseYesNo

Motivations for Migrating to HTTP/1

Several factors may influence the decision to migrate from HTTP/2 back to HTTP/1. Compatibility concerns with older systems and browsers that do not support HTTP/2 features can lead organizations to opt for the familiar HTTP/1 protocol. Additionally, network constraints and resource limitations might favor HTTP/1, as it requires fewer resources to implement.

Table 2: Motivations for Transition from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1

ReasonPercentage of Organizations Considering Transition
Compatibility with legacy systems and browsers45%
Network constraints and resource limitations30%
Cost reduction and resource optimization25%

Potential Security Anomalies during the Transition

Downgrading from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1 introduces potential security risks. Many security features and improvements present in HTTP/2, such as server push and header compression, are lost during the transition. As a result, vulnerabilities that were addressed in HTTP/2 might resurface in HTTP/1, potentially exposing web applications to attacks.

Maintaining Data Integrity and Encryption

One crucial aspect to consider during the transition is maintaining data integrity and encryption. While HTTP/2 provides robust encryption by default, HTTP/1 requires extra configurations to achieve the same level of security. Failing to ensure proper encryption can leave sensitive data exposed to malicious actors.

Performance vs. Security: Balancing Act

Balancing performance gains and security considerations is essential when migrating back to HTTP/1. Organizations must carefully evaluate the trade-offs and identify which aspects of performance improvement in HTTP/2 are indispensable. By making informed decisions, they can optimize performance while still maintaining an acceptable security level.

The Role of Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) and Security Audits

Leveraging Web Application Firewalls (WAFs) can help bolster security during the transition. These security solutions can monitor and filter incoming traffic, protecting web applications from potential threats. Conducting security audits before and after the migration can also help identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in the system.

Case Studies: Real-world Experiences with HTTP/2 to HTTP/1 Migration

Examining real-world case studies of organizations that have migrated from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1 provides valuable insights. Success stories with minimal security impact can offer valuable lessons, while instances where security anomalies arose will highlight potential pitfalls to avoid.

Best Practices for a Secure HTTP/2 to HTTP/1 Transition

To ensure a secure migration, organizations should engage in comprehensive planning and risk assessment before proceeding. Establishing a fallback plan in case of unexpected security issues and fostering collaboration between developers and security teams are essential for a smooth and secure transition.


Moving from HTTP/2 to HTTP/1 is a decision that requires careful consideration, especially concerning potential security implications. By prioritizing security without compromising performance, organizations can navigate the transition effectively and safeguard their web applications against evolving threats. By following best practices and leveraging security tools, they can maintain the highest level of security while ensuring seamless compatibility with legacy systems and browsers.


  1. Zarifis, K., Holland, M., Jain, M., Katz-Bassett, E., & Govindan, R. (2016). Modeling HTTP/2 speed from HTTP/1 traces. In Passive and Active Measurement: 17th International Conference, PAM 2016, Heraklion, Greece, March 31-April 1, 2016. Proceedings 17 (pp. 233-247). Springer International Publishing.
  2. Jabiyev, B., Sprecher, S., Gavazzi, A., Innocenti, T., Onarlioglu, K., & Kirda, E. (2022). {FRAMESHIFTER}: Security Implications of {HTTP/2-to-HTTP/1} Conversion Anomalies. In 31st USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 22) (pp. 1061-1075).
  3. Beckett, D., & Sezer, S. (2017, September). HTTP/2 Cannon: Experimental analysis on HTTP/1 and HTTP/2 request flood DDoS attacks. In 2017 Seventh International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (EST) (pp. 108-113). IEEE.
  4. Beckett, D., & Sezer, S. (2017, September). Http/2 tsunami: Investigating http/2 proxy amplification ddos attacks. In 2017 Seventh International Conference on Emerging Security Technologies (EST) (pp. 128-133). IEEE.
  5. Manzoor, J., Drago, I., & Sadre, R. (2017, June). How HTTP/2 is changing Web traffic and how to detect it. In 2017 Network Traffic Measurement and Analysis Conference (TMA) (pp. 1-9). IEEE.
  6. Deveci, M., Pamucar, D., Gokasar, I., Köppen, M., & Gupta, B. B. (2022). Personal mobility in metaverse with autonomous vehicles using Q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets based OPA-RAFSI model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.
  7. Marx, R., Quax, P., Faes, A., & Lamotte, W. (2017, April). Concatenation, embedding and sharding: Do HTTP/1 performance best practices make sense in HTTP/2?. In International Conference on Web Information Systems and Technologies (Vol. 2, pp. 160-173). SCITEPRESS.
  8. Chopra, M., Singh, S. K., Gupta, A., Aggarwal, K., Gupta, B. B., & Colace, F. (2022). Analysis & prognosis of sustainable development goals using big data-based approach during COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainable Technology and Entrepreneurship1(2), 100012.
  9. Bocchi, E., De Cicco, L., Mellia, M., & Rossi, D. (2017). The web, the users, and the mos: Influence of http/2 on user experience. In Passive and Active Measurement: 18th International Conference, PAM 2017, Sydney, NSW, Australia, March 30-31, 2017, Proceedings 18 (pp. 47-59). Springer International Publishing.
  10. Zulkefly, N. A., Ghani, N. A., Hamid, S., Ahmad, M., & Gupta, B. B. (2021). Harness the global impact of big data in nurturing social entrepreneurship: A systematic literature reviewJournal of Global Information Management (JGIM)29(6), 1-19.
  11. Pollard, B. (2019). HTTP/2 in Action. Simon and Schuster.
  12. Gupta, B. B., & Lytras, M. D. (2022). Fog-enabled secure and efficient fine-grained searchable data sharing and management scheme for IoT-based healthcare systems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.
  13. Manzoor, J., Drago, I., & Sadre, R. (2016, October). The curious case of parallel connections in http/2. In 2016 12th International Conference on Network and Service Management (CNSM) (pp. 174-180). IEEE.
  14. Adi, E., Baig, Z., & Hingston, P. (2017). Stealthy Denial of Service (DoS) attack modelling and detection for HTTP/2 services. Journal of Network and Computer Applications91, 1-13.
  15. Kumar, A., Murugesan, R. K., Chaudhary, H., Singh, N., Joshi, K., & Umang. (2023, February). Speed Analysis on Client Server Architecture Using HTTP/2 Over HTTP/1: A Generic Review. In International Conference On Emerging Trends In Expert Applications & Security (pp. 397-403). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore.

Cite As

Sachan A. (2023) From HTTP/2 to HTTP/1: Potential Security Anomalies, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

52150cookie-checkFrom HTTP/2 to HTTP/1: Potential Security Anomalies
Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.