By: Ameya Sree Kasa, Department of Computer Science & Engineering (Artificial Intelligence), Madanapalle Institute of Technology & Science, Angallu (517325), Andhra Pradesh.ameyasreekasa@gmail.com
Abstract:
Email fraud is a dangerous hazard in the digital era to both people and corporations. This research covers the role of Artificial Intelligence in the prevention and avoidance of email fraud by explaining different methodologies and tactics to detect phishing activity. We contrast how machine learning models, natural language processing, and anomaly detection are efficacious in detecting and mitigating email fraud under traditional and AI-based approaches. It is observed that these findings prove AI makes email fraud detection more accurate and efficient, hence providing a robust defense against the emerging risks. The essay is concluded with a discussion on the future of AI in cybersecurity, along with some recommendations for further research.
Key Words: Email Fraud, Artificial Intelligence, Cybersecurity
1.Introduction:
Email fraud is now one of the huge concerns of the digital age, focused on individual or corporate targets by strategies such as phishing, spoofing, and enterprise email compromise. The purpose of these advanced techniques is to finally deceive recipients to steal critical data or finances. Traditional defenses, including spam filters and rule-based systems, are growing more and more ineffective against new threats.
The paper debates the effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence in the fight against e-mail fraud. It has been pointed out that research into many AI approaches and strategies foretells some major improvements in fraud detection and fighting. Comparing traditional methodologies against AI-based approaches, machine learning models, natural language processing, and anomaly detection outperform the rest. We have illustrated that AI has increased the accuracy and efficiency of email fraud detection to a large extent.
2. Preventive Steps:
Few preventive strategies to control phishing are shown in Figure 2.
2.1. Awareness & User Training:
Understanding the nature and execution of cyber-attacks improves detection, making phishing awareness the first line of protection against them. Increased knowledge and training can help to prevent social engineering, a popular phishing technique. Phishing training is critical, especially given the increasing frequency of global attacks, and it emphasizes the need of procedures such as two-factor authentication and data backups in preventing ransomware attacks. [1] AI-based cybersecurity systems have been extremely successful, with firms investing considerably in these technologies and training personnel on phishing and AI security standards. Employee training minimizes human factor susceptibility, resulting in improved system protection. Online programs, such as ESET’s Cybersecurity Awareness Training, provide accessible education through gamified courses and phishing scenarios, increasing public awareness of cybersecurity. these programs emphasized.[2]
2.2. Email content Analysis:
Phishing detection in emails requires text preparation, feature extraction (BoW, TF-IDF, word embeddings), and content analysis (keyword analysis, NER, sentiment analysis). It involves anomaly detection by URL/link and metadata analysis, behavioral monitoring, and classification training using machine learning models (logistic regression, SVMs, neural networks). Advanced approaches, such as anomaly detection, contextual embeddings (BERT, GPT), and explainable AI, improve detection and trust. Continuous model updates ensure that the model can respond to new phishing strategies.[3]
2.3. Email Authentication:
The following needs to be done in preventing phishing: Checking of the emails through using of the SPF, DKIM, and DMARC for ascertaining the origin of the emails. SPF works in preventing spoofing by a comparison of the sender IPs to the allowed list and DKIM on the other hand, ensures that the message is authentic through signed encryptions. DMARC constructs one or more policy layers for entry messages that do not have a valid SPF or DKIM signature; it is also the source of the report. [4] BIMI helps to build up confidence in the advertised brands by showing the logos of the brands concerned to ensure the emails being sent over were original and not forged while TLS ensures the transfer of the emails is secure through encryption. That is why these measures, when put into practice, reduce phishing threats and sustain the e-mail domain. [5]
2. 4. Behavioral Analysis:
Behavioral analysis for the prevention of phishing involves the observation of the activity of the user to look for some discrepancy that is likely to lead to phishing. As in this context, Systems can define preposterous characteristics like login places and times and interaction profiles. As a proactive measure it serves to enhance the visibility of the compromised accounts and the specialized phishing attacks. The combination of behavioral analysis to current measures of security dramatically improves overall security from phishing. [6]
2.5. Multi Factor Authentication:
MFA improves phishing avoidance by demanding several verification methods from distinct categories: a person gives three things; something they knew such as a password, something they possessed such as a security token, and something inherent in them such as fingerprints. [7] This tiered security technique makes it a little bit difficult for the attackers to gain access using stolen credentials only. In cases where a password is stolen MFA guarantees user accounts since the intruder still needs an added passcode. It greatly reduces the possibility of gaining unlawful access and falling victim to phishing scams.
2. 6. Email Filtering and Security Gateways:
Phishing is prevented by email filtering and security gateways in that incoming emails are scanned for any content that may lead to phishing, links and attachments. These systems employ big, sophisticated algorithms and global threat databases so that no phishing arrives in the user’s mailbox. They also monitor security standards and policies as well as block spam so that only the relevant and genuine emails are delivered. These gateways provide great safeguards against building new phishing strategies as they have the latest threat data feed. [4]
2. 7. Continuous Learning and Adaption:
He said that phishing email avoidance learning, and adaptation would require constant update and enhancement of the detection models to new threat information. Some classes in machine learning examine recent phishing activities to identify emerging trends and strategies. This continual process of assessment ensures security systems are relevant in defending the institution against the ever-emerging threat. This approach enhances the methods used in combating phishing by using feedback and modifying the detection algorithm constantly.
3. Advanced AI Techniques in Cybersecurity:
That would encompass multiple aspects of AI such as utilization of multiple data sources in analysis, Explainable AI, human-AI collaboration etc., are important in enhancing cybersecurity[8]. AI in the current usage of cybersecurity uses datasets that are limited and separate, hence providing inadequate assessment. Further research should be focused on employing and combining multiple sources of data by methods like the deep learning-based entity matching method and multi-view methods. [9] In turn, this method can deliver new ideas, enhancing risk control, and offer systematic view of cybersecurity. XAI focuses on making the decision of artificial intelligence comprehensible to humans. Modern AI systems have low transparency and can be regarded as ‘‘black boxes’’ Applying to them the goal of the research is to make them more explainable and therefore increase trust in their usage in high-risk scenarios.[10]
4.Conclusion:
Email fraud is a huge hazard that threatens both individuals and businesses, growing beyond the capacity of the present security. We can enhance the possibility of detecting and preventing fraudulent activities using Artificial Intelligence (AI). Machine learning models, natural language processing, and anomaly detection have turned out to be much more accurate and efficient compared to previous approaches for email fraud detection.AI-driven methods, together with awareness and user training, email content analysis, authentication procedures, behavioral analysis, multi-factor authentication, and continuous adaption, provide a powerful security mechanism. As AI advances, combining multiple data sources and focusing on explainable AI will strengthen cybersecurity measures and provide resilience against new threats. Future research should focus these areas to preserve and improve AI’s effectiveness in tackling email fraud.
5.References:
- A. K. Abdallah and R. K. Abdallah, “Smart Solutions for Smarter Schools: Leveraging Artificial Intelligence to Revolutionize Educational Administration and Leadership,” in Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology, Sixth Edition, IGI Global, 2025, pp. 1–14. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-7366-5.ch078.
- M. F. Ansari, P. Sharma, and B. Dash, “Prevention of Phishing Attacks Using AI-Based Cybersecurity Awareness Training,” vol. 3, pp. 61–72, Mar. 2022, doi: 10.47893/IJSSAN.2022.1221.
- C. Eze and L. Shamir, “Analysis and Prevention of AI-Based Phishing Email Attacks,” Electronics, vol. 13, p. 1839, May 2024, doi: 10.3390/electronics13101839.
- S. Douzi, F. A. AlShahwan, M. Lemoudden, and B. El Ouahidi, “Hybrid Email Spam Detection Model Using Artificial Intelligence,” Int. J. Mach. Learn. Comput., vol. 10, no. 2, Feb. 2020, doi: 10.18178/ijmlc.2020.10.2.937.
- Rahaman M (2024) Foundations of Phishing Detection Using Deep Learning: A Review of Current Techniques, Insights2Techinfo. Accessed: Aug. 13, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://insights2techinfo.com/foundations-of-phishing-detection-using-deep-learning-a-review-of-current-techniques/
- M. Adil, R. Khan, and M. A. Nawaz Ul Ghani, “Preventive Techniques of Phishing Attacks in Networks,” in 2020 3rd International Conference on Advancements in Computational Sciences (ICACS), Feb. 2020, pp. 1–8. doi: 10.1109/ICACS47775.2020.9055943.
- A. Alhogail and A. Alsabih, “Applying machine learning and natural language processing to detect phishing email,” Comput. Secur., vol. 110, p. 102414, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102414.
- M. Rahaman, F. Tabassum, V. Arya, and R. Bansal, “Secure and sustainable food processing supply chain framework based on Hyperledger Fabric technology,” Cyber Secur. Appl., vol. 2, p. 100045, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.csa.2024.100045.
- P. Pappachan, Sreerakuvandana, and M. Rahaman, “Conceptualising the Role of Intellectual Property and Ethical Behaviour in Artificial Intelligence,” in Handbook of Research on AI and ML for Intelligent Machines and Systems, IGI Global, 2024, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-9999-3.ch001.
- J. Chen and C. Guo, “Online Detection and Prevention of Phishing Attacks,” in 2006 First International Conference on Communications and Networking in China, Oct. 2006, pp. 1–7. doi: 10.1109/CHINACOM.2006.344718.
- Gaurav, A., et al.(2024, January). Enhancing Email Security in Consumer Electronics with a Hybrid Deep Learning Approach. In 2024 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE) (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
- Gupta, B. B., Tewari, A., Cvitić, I., Peraković, D., & Chang, X. (2022). Artificial intelligence empowered emails classifier for Internet of Things based systems in industry 4.0. Wireless networks, 28(1), 493-503.
Cite As
Kasa A. S. (2024) Preventing Email Fraud with AI, Insights2Techinfo