By: Syed Raiyan Ali – syedraiyanali@gmail.com, Department of computer science and Engineering( Data Science ), Student of computer science and Engineering( Data Science ), Madanapalle Institute Of Technology and Science, 517325, Angallu , Andhra Pradesh.
ABSTRACT
AI is a formidable adversary to humanity, reshaping human life in many aspects in this digital age. As AI becomes more popular, there is a marked increase in fear surrounding its effect on human rights and privacy. This paper seeks to explore the intricate relationship between AI and privacy aiming at finding a balance between technological innovation and individual protection. It expands on ethical implications as well as legal frameworks that inform issues around AI usage. One of these issues is the universal need for explainable and transparent Artificial Intelligence stressing on the significance of ethical development processes followed by responsible usage. Through an all-encompassing analysis of both international and national legislation attempts, the article focuses on the legal terrain relating to AI and privacy legislation. The text provides potent suggestions for fostering human-centered future of AI that encompasses innovation while still protecting people’s privacy.
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Privacy, Data Protection, Security, Ethical AI, Legal Framework
INTRODUCTION
In this age of technical enhancement, it is hard if not impossible to live without artificial intelligence. It has revolutionized various sectors including medical services, financial sector and even security systems. Rapid integration of these technologies inevitably leads to many apprehensions about information confidentiality and protection[1]. It has become one of the most significant predicaments that lawmakers, scientists who engage in developing machinery for automatic operation as well as globally communities face; straddling between focusing on advantages associated with AI and appreciating everyone’s personhood rights.
THE DUAL NATURE OF AI
Opportunities
Enormous possibilities are presented by AI when it comes to saving time, making choices and checking if they are right. For example, in medicine we have AI systems that go through large pieces of information about illnesses so they can spot any trends and suggest individual therapies for every patient[2]. On the other hand, in banking there are algorithms used by artificial intelligence that help detect any type of fake transaction. All these improvements are meant to create happier lives as well as accelerating economic development.
Risks
At the base of all evils lurks sprawling tongues that maneuver unabated leading to even worse effects in endowed organizations through improper methods with extreme possible patterns of mismanagement. The results can be social exclusion without voice if seclusion trickles down into norm consciousnesses where the right for access would already have ceased long before coming into spotlights. In addition to this it’s noted that systems designed by man often show same negative traits reflecting human shortcomings regardless whether they are called cyborgs or robots.Private lives basically consist of what goes before therefore users are often forced to sit at home.
ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF AI
Transparency and Accountability
AI doesn’t come simple; it is invisible as a box so that no one would know what goes within its walls. Transparency has become one of the greatest soldiers against this crisis. This secrecy destroys all forms of trust especially in areas such as health and justice where these professionals should act towards making their clients feel safe by giving them proper information at all times[3]. To be able to keep up with the demands for ethical life, we must ensure that our systems can always be tracked back to human beings in the simplest of terms that anyone using it can understand.
One major challenge of using AI technology is transparency. The ‘black box’ metaphor illustrates how difficult it can be for outsiders to comprehend on what basis certain decisions were made by computers or robots powered by Artificial Intelligence systems specifically those which possess no apparent reasoning capabilities like speech recognition devices although they are valid architectures belonging to them since there is still some implicit knowledge implicit within those architectures (truth)[4]. Lack thereof breeds mistrust especially those related to health care or criminal justice issues as it has been noted that not all AI methodologies have positive effects on society (Preventing Artificial Super Intelligence Paper). That’s why having transparency enables people keep faith in these machines when applying them in various situations thus ensuring ethicality (Transparency in AI Ethics).
Bias and Fairness
The quality of AI systems is proportional to that of their training data. However, if this information is riddled with partiality, then one should not be surprised when the AI continues to operate under the same partial or unfair circumstances. As such, we find ourselves in a situation where certain clusters may end up being victimized by the machines. To tackle an issue as complex as this one, bias must be taken into consideration when developing algorithms and datasets that are both varied and accountable.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR AI AND PRIVACY
General Data Protection Regulation
The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), enacted by The European Union, is a monumentally huge piece of legislation that governs probably the most intricate aspect of modern life – how we use our data. It sets out very clear guidelines on gathering, modifying and securing information, hence giving an individual power over his/her private information. AI is especially affected by the principles laid down in GDPR concerning data reductionism and limitation of purpose that must be strictly adhered to when dealing with personal data collection.
Artificial Intelligence Act
European Union has proposed a framework for trustworthy AI that allows for innovation but also protects basic rights. The Act classifies AI systems according to risk levels, with corresponding duties for developers and users required in each case. It is important to ensure that this Act is aligned with current data protection laws such as the GDPR, in order for there to be consistency among regulations.
The below diagram shows the Framework for Balancing AI Innovation and Privacy Protection.
BALANCING DATA SECURITY
Enhancing Data Security
Scrutinizing AI’s privacy issues requires a thorough safeguarding of data[5]. Personal information can be kept secure from intruders and violations through the use of encryptions, anonymization, and safe ways of keeping data safe. The application of these methods necessitates teamwork between the people who make laws, those with technical expertise, and individuals in various industries.
Promoting Ethical AI Development
AI development should not only be regulated but must also observe ethics. This means that you will have to stick to things like justice or equity if building a robot or your creations are anything close to being AI. Two things would happen after this; one ethical procedures for running the robots operations would be written and secondly everything is documented in an understandable manner so everybody involved knows how and when things are supposed to be done[6].
CONCLUSION
The integration of AI into various aspects of life presents both chances and problems. Balancing the benefits of AI with the need to safeguard people’s privacy is a difficult yet essential task. We can use AI without risking individual rights if we have strong laws, ethical AI development and better data security protection. To achieve a future where privacy protection and AI innovation live in peace, all parties involved must join hands.
REFERENCES
- M. Bak, V. I. Madai, M.-C. Fritzsche, M. T. Mayrhofer, and S. McLennan, “You Can’t Have AI Both Ways: Balancing Health Data Privacy and Access Fairly,” Front. Genet., vol. 13, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.3389/fgene.2022.929453.
- A. Talha Khalil and Z. K. Shinwari, “The Dual Nature of AI; A Double-Edged Sword Amid Digital Transformation; an Ethical Analysis,” Int. J. Ethics Soc., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1–8, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.22034/ijethics.6.2.1.
- O. Akinrinola et al., “Navigating and reviewing ethical dilemmas in AI development: Strategies for transparency, fairness, and accountability,” GSC Adv. Res. Rev., vol. 18, no. 3, Art. no. 3, 2024, doi: 10.30574/gscarr.2024.18.3.0088.
- M. D. Dubber, F. Pasquale, and S. Das, The Oxford Handbook of Ethics of AI. Oxford University Press, 2020.
- B. D. Alfia, A. Asroni, S. Riyadi, and M. Rahaman, “Development of Desktop-Based Employee Payroll: A Case Study on PT. Bio Pilar Utama,” Emerg. Inf. Sci. Technol., vol. 4, no. 2, Art. no. 2, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.18196/eist.v4i2.20732.
- P. Pappachan, Sreerakuvandana, and M. Rahaman, “Conceptualising the Role of Intellectual Property and Ethical Behaviour in Artificial Intelligence,” in Handbook of Research on AI and ML for Intelligent Machines and Systems, IGI Global, 2024, pp. 1–26. doi: 10.4018/978-1-6684-9999-3.ch001.
- Aldweesh, A., Alauthman, M., Al Khaldy, M., Ishtaiwi, A., Al-Qerem, A., Almoman, A., & Gupta, B. B. (2023). The meta-fusion: A cloud-integrated study on blockchain technology enabling secure and efficient virtual worlds. International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC), 13(1), 1-24.
- M. Casillo, F. Colace, B. B. Gupta, A. Lorusso, F. Marongiu and D. Santaniello, “Blockchain and NFT: a novel approach to support BIM and Architectural Design,” 2022 International Conference on Innovation and Intelligence for Informatics, Computing, and Technologies (3ICT), Sakheer, Bahrain, 2022, pp. 616-620, doi: 10.1109/3ICT56508.2022.9990815.
- P. Chaudhary, B. B. Gupta, K. T. Chui and S. Yamaguchi, “Shielding Smart Home IoT Devices against Adverse Effects of XSS using AI model,” 2021 IEEE International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 2021, pp. 1-5, doi: 10.1109/ICCE50685.2021.9427591.
Cite As
Ali S.R. (2024) AI AND PRIVACY: BALANCING SECURITY WITH DATA PROTECTION, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1