Hybrid CNN-GRU Networks for Identifying Complex DDoS Patterns

By: Gonipalli Bharath Vel Tech University, Chennai, India International Center for AI and Cyber Security Research and Innovations, Asia University, Taiwan, Gmail: gonipallibharath@gmail.com

Abstract:

Modern network security faces substantial disruption through Distributed Denial-of-Service attacks that target IoT environments because these environments have restricted computational capabilities that make their systems easily penetrable. The traditional IDS approaches based on rules and signatures experience major difficulties detecting new threats because hackers improve their techniques to avoid established security protocols. The article details a combination between Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) and Gated Recurrent Units (GRU) which implements a deep learning solution to detect complicated DDoS attack forms. The CNN network component recovers spatial patterns from network traffic information which combined with GRU network component detection of sequential patterns results in better identification of pre-existing and new attack types. Evaluation shows that the combination of CNN and GRU technology produces improved performance than regular machine learning methods alongside independent deep learning models particularly regarding accuracy rates alongside rapid detection speed and system flexibility. The system represents a strong solution for real-time cybersecurity applications because it boosts network defense systems that fight against advanced cyber threats.

Introduction:

DDoS attacks represent a leading disruptive cyber threat which violates businesses and government institutions and also affects cloud service operations. The malicious traffic violations generated by these attacks overwhelms network and server infrastructure which results in denial-of-service for legitimate users. The modern DDoS attack techniques which use botnets and multi-vector methods become undetectable through traditional security detection methods because of their heightened complexity[1].

Firewalls and threshold-based anomaly detection systems together with rule-based intrusion detection systems demonstrate insufficient capability against current DDoS attacks. The static thresholds together with predefined signatures used by these methods cannot identify fresh attack patterns or new attack methods. The success of deep learning frameworks in the market has allowed their adoption because these methods show data learning capabilities that enable real-time intelligent decisions[2].

Deep learning models operate separately as CNN and RNN have been used for DDoS detection yet they present specific operational limitations. The feature extraction abilities of CNN make it excellent but it fails to discover sequential patterns while both GRU and LSTM represent temporal dependencies yet their spatial feature understanding remains weak. The implementation of CNN and GRU components within a unified model provides an advanced system to detect advanced DDoS attacks because it enables superior performance from their combined features[3].

Analysis of DDoS Attacks along with the Obstacles in Their Detection Method:

Types of DDoS Attacks- There are three main groups which classify DDoS attacks.

• Volumetric Attacks: The strategy of volumetric attacks produces massive network traffic quantities to exhaust bandwidth capacity which results in system unresponsiveness. The three typical denial-of-service attack methods are UDP floods together with ICMP floods as well as DNS amplification attacks[4].
• Protocol Attacks: Attackers use protocol attacks to penetrate network protocol vulnerabilities for exhausting server resources through TCP/IP layer weaknesses. Attackers execute this category of attacks through SYN floods together with Ping of Death and Smurf attacks[5].
• Application-Layer Attacks: Application-Layer Attacks employ a tactic to duplicate normal traffic streams which makes identifying these attacks considerably difficult. Distributed Denial of Service attacks happen through HTTP floods and Slowloris attacks[6].

Challenges in DDoS Detection:

Several elements make it difficult to detect DDoS attacks in their entirety. The attackers regularly evolve their methods which makes it hard for defense systems to use static detection patterns. Further more network traffic possesses such vast volume and dynamic nature that efficient real-time processing requires appropriate models for high-dimensional data evaluation. Deep learning models are required to detect subtle attack patterns because some DDoS attacks function with minimal traffic rates. The hybrid model of CNN-GRU solves detection problems through its ability to recognize spatial and temporal attack features which results in better and faster detection processes[7].

Working Mechanism of CNN-GRU:

Network traffic patterns requiring detection become possible through the feature extraction capabilities of CNN which identifies potentially dangerous attacks. Through its filter application mechanism this layer system detects essential features including packet flow anomalies together with protocol irregularities. The extracted features move through GRU layers to evaluate time-based behaviors in network traffic patterns. GRU implements gating systems to store important data points alongside basic information cleanup which results in better processing speed and maintains long-range relationships between inputs[8].

Advantages of CNN-GRU for DDoS Detection:

The hybrid CNN-GRU model produces multiple benefits that surpass those of conventional deep learning systems independently or in the traditional setting.

• Enhanced Feature Learning-

The network traffic anomaly detection accuracy of the model increases through the addition of CNN because it enables better spatial dependency recognition. The system produces fewer incorrect classifications and achieves higher total detection accuracy.

• Effective Temporal Analysis-

The recognition ability of GRU enables the model to detect various patterns of attacks including gradual evolving attack patterns together with fast high-intensity bursts of traffic.

• Better Generalization-

The combined features of spatial input and sequential output in the CNN-GRU system allow it to detect new attack patterns which static signature-based threat detection methods cannot achieve.

• Real-Time Detection-

The quick performance of CNN-GRU lets analysts detect DDoS attacks immediately and prevent system disruptions from occurring.

Performance Evaluation and Results:

Dataset and Experimental Setup-

CNN-GRU model received its evaluation through publicly available datasets including the CICDDoS2019 dataset and NSL-KDD dataset.

• CICDDoS2019 provides researchers with a dataset including various DDoS attack forms[9].
• The NSL-KDD dataset provides widespread use among researchers who conduct intrusion detection assessments[10].

The developers utilized Python together with TensorFlow and Keras during training operations. Feature selection combined with variable normalization and categorical variable encoding formed all preprocessing stages of the analysis.

Comparison with other models:

The experimental findings showed CNN-GRU to produce superior results than Decision Trees and SVM models. The hybrid model surpassed deep learning models CNN and LSTM in terms of accuracy performance while producing decreased false positive records.

Challenges and Future Directions:

Challenges in Implementing CNN-GRU-

The process of implementing CNN-GRU encounters multiple barriers even though it provides numerous benefits. The procedure demands considerable computational capability particularly when examining big-scale network data. Carrying out data augmentation or class weighting techniques becomes necessary when imbalances between classes affect model performance.

Future Enhancements-

Researchers should focus on these following enhancements to improve the capability of CNN-GRU in future explorations:

• Attention Mechanisms: The incorporation of attention mechanisms develops an improved system for feature selection which helps boost detection performance.
• Federated Learning: The implementation of CNN-GRU occurs through Federated Learning using various network settings for parallel learning operations.
• Edge Computing Integration: Edge Computing Integration aims to create a lightweight deployment version of this model suitable for IoT and edge device platforms.

Conclusion:

A robust DDoS attack detection system emerges from the combination of CNN and GRU to process sequential information and extract features from it. The use of CNN alongside GRU provides the model which succeeds in improving accuracy levels and adding real-time detection while adapting better to varying conditions. Hybrid deep learning models will serve an essential function in upcoming cybersecurity defense systems because cyber threats continue to develop. The effectiveness of this approach will receive additional enhancement through future optimizations of deployment strategies and real-world optimization techniques.

References:

1. K. B. Adedeji, A. M. Abu-Mahfouz, and A. M. Kurien, “DDoS Attack and Detection Methods in Internet-Enabled Networks: Concept, Research Perspectives, and Challenges,” J. Sens. Actuator Netw., vol. 12, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jsan12040051.
2. E. Owusu et al., “Online Network DoS/DDoS Detection: Sampling, Change Point Detection, and Machine Learning Methods,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., pp. 1–1, 2024, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2024.3488580.
3. Y. Imrana, Y. Xiang, L. Ali, A. Noor, K. Sarpong, and M. A. Abdullah, “CNN-GRU-FF: a double-layer feature fusion-based network intrusion detection system using convolutional neural network and gated recurrent units,” Complex Intell. Syst., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 3353–3370, Jun. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s40747-023-01313-y.
4. V. Vedula, “Robust Techniques to Detect and Mitigate Volumetric and Non-Volumetric Network Attacks,” Ph.D., The University of Texas at San Antonio, United States — Texas, 2024. Accessed: Feb. 20, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.proquest.com/docview/3103025321/abstract/D9BE23D5AF7459DPQ/1
5. R. Uddin, S. A. P. Kumar, and V. Chamola, “Denial of service attacks in edge computing layers: Taxonomy, vulnerabilities, threats and solutions,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 152, p. 103322, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.adhoc.2023.103322.
6. A. Hirsi et al., “Comprehensive Analysis of DDoS Anomaly Detection in Software-Defined Networks,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 23013–23071, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3535943.
7. K. B. Adedeji, A. M. Abu-Mahfouz, and A. M. Kurien, “DDoS Attack and Detection Methods in Internet-Enabled Networks: Concept, Research Perspectives, and Challenges,” J. Sens. Actuator Netw., vol. 12, no. 4, Art. no. 4, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.3390/jsan12040051.
8. K. S. Goud and G. S. Rao, “Towards an Efficient DDoS Attack Detection in SDN: An Approach with CNN-GRU Fusion,” in 2024 Fourth International Conference on Advances in Electrical, Computing, Communication and Sustainable Technologies (ICAECT), Jan. 2024, pp. 1–10. doi: 10.1109/ICAECT60202.2024.10469528.
9. M. Mittal, K. Kumar, and S. Behal, “Deep learning approaches for detecting DDoS attacks: a systematic review,” Soft Comput., vol. 27, no. 18, pp. 13039–13075, Sep. 2023, doi: 10.1007/s00500-021-06608-1.
10. J. Barach, “Enhancing Intrusion Detection with CNN Attention Using NSL-KDD Dataset,” in 2024 Artificial Intelligence for Business (AIxB), Dec. 2024, pp. 15–20. doi: 10.1109/AIxB62249.2024.00009.
11. Lv, L., Wu, Z., Zhang, L., Gupta, B. B., & Tian, Z. (2022). An edge-AI based forecasting approach for improving smart microgrid efficiency. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(11), 7946-7954.
12. Mirsadeghi, F., Rafsanjani, M. K., & Gupta, B. B. (2021). A trust infrastructure based authentication method for clustered vehicular ad hoc networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14, 2537-2553.
13. A. Dahiya, B. B. Gupta (2021) How IoT is Making DDoS Attacks More Dangerous?, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

Cite As

Bharath G. (2025) Hybrid CNN-GRU Networks for Identifying Complex DDoS Patterns, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

833400cookie-checkHybrid CNN-GRU Networks for Identifying Complex DDoS Patternsyes