Implementing Custom Tokens and Smart Contracts for Decentralized Applications (DApps)

By: Palvasha Bansal, Chandigarh College of Engineering and Technology, Chandigarh, India, Email:

Abstract. This research explores the role of custom tokens and smart contracts in decentralized applications (DApps). Tokens are pivotal in blockchain and cryptocurrency, representing tradable digital assets governed by smart contracts, primarily on Ethereum. We delve into the distinctions between payment, security, and utility tokens, crucial for navigating regulatory landscapes. Our contribution involves detecting and classifying crypto tokens from bytecode, examining regulatory standards, and presenting methodologies for identifying and categorizing deployed token contracts. Using Ethereum transaction data up to block 8,750,000, our work provides insights into practical implementation and token usage patterns, contributing valuable knowledge for developers, regulators, and stakeholders in the decentralized technology space.

Keywords: Custom Tokens, Smart Contracts, Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Ethereum..

1 Introduction

Decentralized applications (dApps), operating on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks without centralized control, have become integral to the evolving landscape of blockchain technology. Typically, these applications exhibit a browser or app interface at the front end, while their backend often leverages blockchain or cryptocurrency elements. Key categories of dApps encompass decentralized finance, gambling, games, and marketplaces, with many introducing proprietary tokens within their ecosystems[1][2].

At the core of this intricate web lies the concept of crypto tokens—digital assets residing atop a cryptocurrency or blockchain. Frequently programmable and managed by smart contracts, crypto tokens lack their own distributed ledger but instead thrive on existing infrastructures. This intricate relationship introduces the concept of tokenization, wherein rights to assets are transformed into digital artifacts, offering advantages such as heightened liquidity, programmability, and immutable proof of ownership.While tokens can serve as a medium of exchange or even function as a local currency within dApps, their true potential emerges through programmability. Serving as triggers for specific functions within dApp smart contracts, tokens extend beyond simple exchange transactions. Their versatility extends to linking with off-chain assets, fundraising, pre-orders, investments, and fostering ecosystems or communities[3]. Custom tokens and smart contracts often involve numerous transactions and computations. Parallel computing [21-22] allows for concurrent execution of these tasks, enabling faster processing and reduced latency.

The creation of tokens involves smart contracts, specifically token contracts, deployed on existing blockchains. Widely embraced, this application type has established coding patterns and best practices, supported by the availability of token contract factories, both on-chain and as web services. Token acquisition methods are diverse, ranging from purchases during initial coin offerings (ICOs) to trading on crypto exchanges or receiving them freely through airdrops or service-based rewards.The value of a token hinges on the interplay of supply, demand, and community trust, cultivated through credibility and service offerings. Amidst these advancements, challenges persist, such as the lack of standardized tokenization practices and legal infrastructure across jurisdictions. This research endeavors to address these gaps, contributing insights into the implementation and implications of custom tokens and smart contracts within the realm of decentralized applications[4][5][6][7].

In the rapidly advancing landscape of blockchain technology, the integration of decentralized applications (dApps) has emerged as a transformative force. These dApps operate on peer-to-peer (P2P) networks, embodying a paradigm shift away from centralized control. As we delve into the multifaceted world of dApps, it’s crucial to recognize their profound impact on various domains, including deep learning, cloud computing, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity[8][9][10]. The synergy between dApps and these cutting-edge technologies holds immense potential for reshaping how information is processed, stored, and secured. Just as dApps revolutionize the user interface with browser or app interfaces, their backend leverages the foundational principles of blockchain and cryptocurrency[11][12][13].

This intersection becomes even more pivotal when considering the role of smart contracts and crypto tokens within dApps. These digital assets, programmable and governed by smart contracts, bring programmability to the forefront, extending beyond simple exchange transactions. As we embark on this exploration of custom tokens and smart contracts, it is essential to recognize the broader implications for technologies like deep learning, cloud computing, machine learning, artificial intelligence, and cybersecurity[14][15][16][17]. The transformative possibilities in these domains, coupled with the challenges that persist, highlight the importance of our research in contributing valuable insights to this dynamic and evolving landscape[18][19][20].

2 Understanding DApps, Smart Contracts and custom tokens

2.1 DApps

Decentralized applications, or DApps, mark a significant departure from traditional software models, utilizing smart contracts and blockchain technology to create trustless and peer-to-peer applications. The term “DApp” signifies a decentralized application, reflecting the departure from single-entity control. Pronounced as “dee-app” or “dapp,” DApps distinguish themselves by operating without a central server, challenging the conventional client-server model seen in centralized applications.In a conventional application structure, data, user interface, and computation are typically provided or controlled by a single entity. DApps revolutionize this by leveraging smart contracts and the blockchain for data storage and processing. Although DApp user interfaces often resemble traditional websites, the crucial distinction lies in the integration of one or more smart contracts within the blockchain. This conceptualizes a complete DApp as a website enriched by blockchain-embedded smart contracts, emphasizing the decentralized, transparent, and trustless nature of DApp development and functionality[1][3].

2.2 Smart Contracts

Smart contracts, a term coined by computer scientist and legal scholar Nick Szabo in 1994, are computerized transaction protocols designed to automatically execute the terms of a contract. Szabo’s vision was to bring efficiency to contractual agreements by automating their enforcement. Analogous to a vending machine, smart contracts, when run on the Ethereum platform, operate as Turing-complete computer programs that can enforce specific types of agreements between parties without requiring an intrinsic connection to legal contracts. While the term “contract” implies an agreement between parties and “smart” denotes the self-executing nature without the need for intermediaries, the widespread adoption of Ethereum’s smart contract concept has led to some confusion regarding the broader capabilities of blockchain technology. Despite their name, smart contracts are essentially specialized software programs and may or may not have legal implications, necessitating a traditional legal framework if integrated into legal transactions, as seen in examples like securitizing real estate through smart contracts, which still requires accompanying traditional legal contracts in relevant jurisdictions[3].

2.2 Custom Tokens

Custom tokens play a pivotal role in the evolving landscape of digital assets, operating within the broader terminology of “coins,” “tokens,” “cryptocurrencies,” and “crypto assets.” Distinguished from base currencies like Bitcoin or Ether, which serve as integral parts of their respective blockchain platforms, custom tokens are secondary units built on established networks, enabling the creation of new digital assets without necessitating user adoption of a new platform or software. Ethereum, designed to facilitate arbitrary computer programs, provides an ideal environment for creating tokens through smart contracts, allowing developers to establish tokens with specific supply, distribution goals, and custom logic. While tokens lack innate properties beyond bookkeeping, they fall into basic genres, such as utility tokens and security tokens, each serving distinct functions in raising capital for projects or businesses. The emergence of Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs) as a means of fundraising, particularly during the peak of 2017–2018, saw blockchain startups amassing substantial funds by selling cryptocurrency-based tokens, although regulatory scrutiny has since increased, impacting the dynamics of token sales[6][7].

3 Implementing custom tokens and smart contracts along with DApps

The utilization of custom tokens and smart contracts within the realm of decentralized applications (DApps) has opened avenues for innovation across various sectors. DApps have found practical applications in fundraising through Initial Coin Offerings (ICOs), marketplaces, financial services, identity verification (KYC and AML), securitization of assets, supply chain management, and gaming. The implementation of smart contracts has particularly revolutionized financial services by significantly lowering entry barriers that were once formidable in traditional banking or stock exchange operations. In contrast to the substantial capital and infrastructure required to establish a bank, a smart contract-based system allows anyone with programming skills to create a secure platform for handling substantial assets. This was exemplified by EtherDelta, a cryptocurrency exchange smart contract that, at its peak, managed over a billion dollars in Ethereum (ETH) and tokens, showcasing the potential of decentralized financial systems [3][4].

Furthermore, smart contracts address the growing concern of data ownership, offering users greater control over their personal information in the wake of security breaches and data monetization by large corporations. Beyond financial applications, a well-designed smart contract system could facilitate regulatory oversight by enabling authorities to monitor and authorize specific activities within a platform. For instance, a marketplace where merchants and consumers register unique identities could automatically execute and tax transactions at government-specified rates, aligning societal and commercial interests within a common system. This shift from disparate bureaucratic entities to a decentralized control system holds immense potential [2][5].

The core of these advancements lies in the Ethereum blockchain, where smart contracts are executed. Ethereum, launched in 2015, has seen continuous development, akin to the early stages of Internet technologies. DApp development involves a suite of tools, including MetaMask for user interaction, various wallets like MyEtherWallet and hardware wallets such as Trezor and Ledger for secure transactions. Additionally, developers utilize integrated development environments (IDEs) like Remix, testing frameworks such as Truffle, and the Solidity programming language to construct DApps. Automated testing, essential for smart contract development, is facilitated by tools like Truffle and Ganache. Despite these advancements, smart contract maintenance poses unique challenges due to their immutability once deployed. Strategies for smart contract upgrades, such as pointer contracts or new contract issuance, are crucial considerations to ensure seamless transitions and the sustained integrity of decentralized systems[7]. Parallelizing the execution [23-25] of smart contracts and token-related operations can significantly reduce processing time. This is crucial for maintaining a responsive and user-friendly experience within decentralized applications.

4 Conclusion

In conclusion, this research sheds light on the pivotal role of custom tokens and smart contracts within the dynamic landscape of decentralized applications (DApps). The exploration of crypto tokens, their classifications, and the regulatory frameworks surrounding them contributes valuable insights to developers, regulators, and stakeholders in the decentralized technology space. The rise of DApps, operating on trustless and peer-to-peer networks, has introduced a paradigm shift from centralized control, and our study emphasizes the significance of custom tokens and smart contracts in enhancing the functionalities of these applications.The deployment of token contracts on existing blockchains, especially Ethereum, has become a widely embraced practice, supported by established coding patterns and best practices. Token acquisition methods, ranging from ICOs to trading on exchanges, reflect the diverse paths tokens take to enter the market. Furthermore, the study provides insights into the practical implementation and usage patterns of custom tokens and smart contracts, using Ethereum transaction data as a basis. As the decentralized technology space continues to evolve, challenges persist, including the lack of standardized tokenization practices and legal infrastructure. Smart contract maintenance poses unique hurdles due to their immutability, prompting the need for thoughtful strategies in upgrades. The dynamic nature of the field, coupled with the potential for regulatory changes, calls for ongoing exploration and adaptation to ensure the sustained integrity and innovation in the realm of decentralized applications.


  1. Bashir, I. (2020). Mastering Blockchain: A deep dive into distributed ledgers, consensus protocols, smart contracts, DApps, cryptocurrencies, Ethereum, and more. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  2. Antonopoulos, A. M., & Wood, G. (2018). Mastering ethereum: building smart contracts and dapps. O’reilly Media.
  3. Metcalfe, W. (2020). Ethereum, smart contracts, DApps. Blockchain and Crypt Currency, 77.
  4. Mukhopadhyay, M. (2018). Ethereum Smart Contract Development: Build blockchain-based decentralized applications using solidity. Packt Publishing Ltd.
  5. Garg, R. (2022). Decentralized transaction mechanism based on smart contracts. In 3rd International Conference on Blockchain and IoT, Sydney Australia.
  6. Rohr, J., & Wright, A. (2018). Blockchain-based token sales, initial coin offerings, and the democratization of public capital markets. Hastings LJ, 70, 463.
  7. J. Dafflon, J. Baylina, and T. Shababi, “ERC-777 token standard,” 2015, accessed 2019-10-12. [Online]. Available: https://eips.ethereum. org/EIPS/eip-777
  8. Singh, S. K., Sharma, S. K., Singla, D., & Gill, S. S. (2022). Evolving requirements and application of SDN and IoT in the context of industry 4.0, blockchain and artificial intelligence. Software Defined Networks: Architecture and Applications, 427-496.
  9. Aggarwal, K., Singh, S. K., Chopra, M., Kumar, S., & Colace, F. (2022). Deep learning in robotics for strengthening industry 4.0.: opportunities, challenges and future directions. Robotics and AI for Cybersecurity and Critical Infrastructure in Smart Cities, 1-19.
  10. Peñalvo, F. J. G., Sharma, A., Chhabra, A., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Arya, V., & Gaurav, A. (2022). Mobile cloud computing and sustainable development: Opportunities, challenges, and future directions. International Journal of Cloud Applications and Computing (IJCAC)12(1), 1-20.
  11. Mengi, G., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Mahto, D., & Sharma, A. (2021, September). Automated Machine Learning (AutoML): The Future of Computational Intelligence. In International Conference on Cyber Security, Privacy and Networking (pp. 309-317). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  12. Saini, T., Kumar, S., Vats, T., & Singh, M. (2020). Edge Computing in Cloud Computing Environment: Opportunities and Challenges. In International Conference on Smart Systems and Advanced Computing (Syscom-2021).
  13. Singh, M., & Kumar, S. (2020). Distributed ledger technology.
  14. Singh, I., Singh, S. K., Singh, R., & Kumar, S. (2022, May). Efficient loop unrolling factor prediction algorithm using machine learning models. In 2022 3rd International Conference for Emerging Technology (INCET) (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
  15. Gupta, A., Singh, S. K., & Chopra, M. (2023). Impact of Artificial Intelligence and the Internet of Things in Modern Times and Hereafter: An Investigative Analysis. In Advanced Computer Science Applications (pp. 157-173). Apple Academic Press.
  16. Peñalvo, F. J. G., Maan, T., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Arya, V., Chui, K. T., & Singh, G. P. (2022). Sustainable Stock Market Prediction Framework Using Machine Learning Models. International Journal of Software Science and Computational Intelligence (IJSSCI)14(1), 1-15.
  17. Dubey, H. A. R. S. H. I. T., Kumar, S. U. D. H. A. K. A. R., & Chhabra, A. N. U. R. E. E. T. (2022). Cyber Security Model to Secure Data Transmission using Cloud Cryptography. Cyber Secur. Insights Mag2, 9-12.
  18. Singh, S. K., Madaan, A., Aggarwal, A., & Dewan, A. (2014). Computing Power Utilization of Distributed Systems Using Distributed Compilation: A Clustered HPC Approach. British Journal of Mathematics & Computer Science, 4(20), 2884-2900
  19. Rastogi, A., Sharma, A., Singh, S., & Kumar, S. (2017). Capacity and Inclination of High Performance Computing in Next Generation Computing. Proceedings of the 11th INDIACom. IEEE.
  20. Singh, M., Singh, S. K., Kumar, S., Madan, U., & Maan, T. (2021, September). Sustainable Framework for Metaverse Security and Privacy: Opportunities and Challenges. In International Conference on Cyber Security, Privacy and Networking (pp. 329-340). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
  21. Kumar, S. S., Singh, S. K., Aggarwal, N., & Aggarwal, K. (2021). Efficient speculative parallelization architecture for overcoming speculation overheads. In International Conference on Smart Systems and Advanced Computing (Syscom-2021) (Vol. 3080, pp. 132-138).
  22. Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., & Aggarwal, N. (2023, September). Sustainable Data Dependency Resolution Architectural Framework to Achieve Energy Efficiency Using Speculative Parallelization. In 2023 3rd International Conference on Innovative Sustainable Computational Technologies (CISCT) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.
  23. Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., & Aggarwal, N. (2023). Speculative parallelism on multicore chip architecture strengthen green computing concept: A survey. In Advanced Computer Science Applications (pp. 3-16). Apple Academic Press.
  24. Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., Aggarwal, N., Gupta, B. B., Alhalabi, W., & Band, S. S. (2022). An efficient hardware supported and parallelization architecture for intelligent systems to overcome speculative overheads. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 37(12), 11764-11790.
  25. Kumar, S., Singh, S. K., Aggarwal, N., & Aggarwal, K. (2021). Evaluation of automatic parallelization algorithms to minimize speculative parallelism overheads: An experiment. Journal of Discrete Mathematical Sciences and Cryptography, 24(5), 1517-1528.

Cite As:

Bansal P. (2024) Implementing Custom Tokens and Smart Contracts for Decentralized Applications (DApps), Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

65730cookie-checkImplementing Custom Tokens and Smart Contracts for Decentralized Applications (DApps)
Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.