By: Vanna karthik; Vel Tech University, Chennai, India
Abstract
Through psychological manipulation social engineers use human psychology to achieve illegal access to various sensitive assets including information systems as well as physical buildings. Social engineering consists of multiple tactics beyond phishing that include pretexting as well as baiting and tailgating and quid pro quo attacks. This paper investigates multiple social engineering methods together with their psychological elements and real-life examples and how attackers develop their techniques year by year. The paper outlines protective methods which people and groups can use to protect against these security dangers. Gaining knowledge about social engineering enables us to develop better abilities to notice and combat manipulative attempts.
Introduction
People and organizations face a critical security challenge because of the digital revolution. Despite enhanced cybersecurity defenses, cyber attackers now utilize human vulnerability because people serve as the primary security vulnerability. The art of manipulating individuals into giving up confidential details or carrying out actions which endanger security emerged as a sophisticated danger. Among social engineering tactics, phishing stands as the most prevalent approach which remains well known but represents the visible part of the complete scheme[1]. The article analyzes social engineering within its broader scope by studying multiple forms alongside psychological methods alongside effective defense strategies against these threats.
What is Social Engineering?
The non-technical attack method known as social engineering depends primarily on psychological manipulation of human interactions. Social engineering separates from traditional cyber-attacks since it targets human susceptibilities instead of software holes by accessing trust alongside curiosity along with fear and greed thousands. The inherent characteristics of individuals serve as stalking grounds for attackers who conduct deceitful operations leading people to violate security protocols unknowingly[2].
The primary reason why social engineering attacks succeed is that they attack the human element while bypassing current security measures. The various types of social engineering attacks rely on human nature through methods such as password extraction or link clicks and unauthorized physical location access.
The Many Faces of Social Engineering[3]
Social engineering includes a wide range of tactics which extend beyond phishing systems because each method is designed for unique situations and particular outcomes. Several dominant social engineering attack strategies appear in the following list:
Phishing : Fraudulent emails and deceptive messages along with disingenuous websites compose the phishing attack scenario. Extracting sensitive information including usernames and passwords and financial data alongside personal records is what attackers aim to obtain from their deceptive tactics. Traditional phishing attacks are generic, but spear phishing attacks target specific information from particular people and organizations.
Pretexting : rasterizing a non-existent scenario referred to as pretext functions to deceitfully build trust with victims. Attackers pretend to work as law enforcement staff or executive managers or IT support personnel to acquire confidential data from victims. Attackers phish employee credentials by claiming to represent IT support when they call pretending to resolve a fictitious technical problem.
Baiting : Attackers bait their victims through attractive free offers to exploit human curiosity or greed whether the targets want free software or movie downloads or confidential USB drives. When people accept the bait offerings the result leads them to unintentionally load malware along with releasing vital personal information.
Tailgating : An authorized person’s entry into restricted areas becomes vulnerable through a security practice known as tailgating where attackers shelter behind them. An attacker executes tailgating through impersonating a delivery person who needs someone to keep the door open thus gaining access to protected areas.
Quid Pro Quo : The attacker in these attacks provides a valuable trade to obtain crucial access or data from their victims. Attackers execute this method by making several calls to organizational personnel to obtain their login information by offering cost-free technical assistance. Despite the need for only one individual to follow their instructions the attacker will accomplish their goals.
Impersonation : An impersonation attack requires someone to pretend they are either a vendor or employee or customer to win trust and obtain access. An attacker blends this approach with other methods of social engineering.
The Psychology Behind Social Engineering[4]
The fundamental psychological aspects which human beings possess make social engineering attacks highly successful. Attackers implement multiple psychological concepts which work to exploit human behaviors during their social engineering schemes.
Authority : People usually yield to requests which they interpret as coming from authoritative figures such as managers or law enforcement or IT administrators.
Urgency : The creation of an urgent or fearful situation prompts victims to act hastily before properly evaluating the situation.
Reciprocity : People naturally feel compelled to repay others when they receive something first through the principle of reciprocity. Thus, they provide information after receiving a specific service.
Curiosity : The natural human quality to seek answers about things makes baiting cyber-attacks particularly successful.
Trust : Attackers take advantage of human trust toward commonly known brands or colleagues and institutions.
People need to understand psychological activation patterns because they serve as needed signals to detect social engineering attempts.
Evolving tactics on social media[5]
The growing awareness of social engineering forces attackers to implement new and improved methods to maintain superiority against defense systems. Some emerging trends include:
Deep fake technology : Attackers employ artificial intelligence to create deep-fake audio and video which allows them to impersonate executive personnel as well as respected figures.
Vishing : Vishing represents a voice version of phishing that hackers execute as phone-based attacks.
Social media exploitation : Attackers make use of immense personal data found on social media platforms to create well-targeted computer attacks.
Hybrid Attacks execute a compound of various social engineering techniques for improving attack success rates through the integration of phishing and pretexting methods.
Mitigation Strategies[6]
Prevention of social engineering attacks demands both the education of personnel and technological defenses and proactive security measures. Several strategies exist to reduce social engineering risks.
Employee training :The organization should organize standard training sessions which enable staff members to learn about social engineering scams and their appropriate responses. Organizations achieve better results when they run simulated phishing exercises.
Multi factor authentication : MFA implements additional authentication steps that strengthen security and prevent unauthorized access even from someone who has access to credentials.
Verification Protocol : Organizations should enforce strict verification frameworks that verify important requests especially when dealing with sensitive details and financial operations
Incident response plan : The organization should establish incident response plans which need to undergo testing to enhance speed during social engineering attack responses.
The organization must conduct awareness campaigns to create security culture among its members who should report any concerning incidents.
Conclusion
Human psychology represents a numerous and always changing security risk which enables attack techniques around technical protection systems. Social engineers continue to adopt new deceptive approaches because phishing remains their main social engineering tactic. Organizations and individuals who comprehend social engineering attacks can better defend themselves through strong preventing measures. The fight against social engineering can best be managed through human awareness alongside continuous observation.
References
- N. Q. Do, A. Selamat, O. Krejcar, E. Herrera-Viedma, and H. Fujita, “Deep Learning for Phishing Detection: Taxonomy, Current Challenges and Future Directions,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 36429–36463, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3151903.
- R. Salama, F. Al-Turjman, S. Bhatla, and S. P. Yadav, “Social engineering attack types and prevention techniques- A survey,” in 2023 International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Communication Technology and Networking (CICTN), Apr. 2023, pp. 817–820. doi: 10.1109/CICTN57981.2023.10140957.
- A. Eleyan, “A-SURVEY-OF-SOCIAL-ENGINEERING-ATTACKS-DETECTION-AND-PREVENTION-TOOLS.,” . Vol., no. 18, 2021.
- M. A. Siddiqi, W. Pak, and M. A. Siddiqi, “A Study on the Psychology of Social Engineering-Based Cyberattacks and Existing Countermeasures,” Appl. Sci., vol. 12, no. 12, Art. no. 12, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/app12126042.
- H. J. Akeiber, “The Evolution of Social Engineering Attacks: A Cybersecurity Engineering Perspective,” vol. 3, no. 1.
- Jafer Hera, “Phishing Defense Mechanisms: Strategies for Effective Measurement and Cyber Threat Mitigation,” 2024, Unpublished. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27576.15364.
- P. Pappachan, M. Rahaman, S. Sreerakuvandana, S. Bansal, and V. Arya, “Beyond current cryptography,” in Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series, 2024, pp. 1–30.
- M. Rahaman, S. S. Bakkireddygari, S. Chattopadhyay, A. L. Gomez, V. Arya, and S. Bansal, “Infrastructure and network security,” in Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series, 2024, pp. 108–144.
- Fatemidokht, H., Rafsanjani, M. K., Gupta, B. B., & Hsu, C. H. (2021). Efficient and secure routing protocol based on artificial intelligence algorithms with UAV-assisted for vehicular ad hoc networks in intelligent transportation systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 22(7), 4757-4769.
- Arya V. (2023) The Evolution of Phishing Attacks How Machine Learning Keeps Up, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1
Cite As
Karthik V. (2025) Phishing and Beyond : The Broader World of Social Engineering, Insights2techinfo pp.1