How to Detect and Prevent Man-In-The-Middle(MITM) Attacks

By: Vanna karthik; Vel Tech University, Chennai, India

Abstract

Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attacks represent the most prevalent cybersecurity threats because they allow attackers to sneak in and tamper with data sent between two users who never detect the breach. Organizations experience severe data breaches along with privacy breaches and financial costs when MITM attacks happen. The following paper analyzes how to stop and identify MITM attacks while explaining their execution methods along with available protection approaches. Security protection against these attacks becomes possible through joint deployment of cryptographic technology frameworks with network surveillance tools and training programs for users. This article explains the preventive methods while discussing detection techniques and secure communication protocols needed for digital communication protection.

Introduction

A Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack happens when a criminal entity breaks into the communications pathway between two parties normally called client and server. Without knowledge of the breach the attacker can use the communication channel to either alter content or steal information or inject malicious code which remains undetected by all parties. MITM attacks to steal information from multiple forms of communication including email systems and website connections as well as telephone conversations. Digital information transmission reveals the need for understanding how Man-in-the-Middle attacks operate and what steps to take for their detection and prevention[1].

Understanding Man-in-the-Middle Attacks

MITM attacks can be classified into different types based on the method of interception and manipulation. These include:

Packet Sniffing : The tools enable attackers to intercept network-data packets that travel between devices. Information packets containing sensitive data such as passwords and user credentials and confidential personal details flow from various devices to exposed networks.

Session Hijacking : Hackers take over genuine user sessions during this kind of attack to gain unauthorized access. Once accessed by an attacker the system allows the perpetrator to execute user actions which might lead to catastrophic results[2].

SSL Stripping : The stripping of Secure Socket Layer function allows attackers to reduce HTTPS encryption levels to HTTP which creates an opening for data interception as well as modification between users and websites[2].

DNS Spoofing :Attackers exploit the Domain Name System (DNS) procedures to divert victims to deceptive sites where they either lose data to thieves or receive infectious malware[3].

Flowchart: MITM Attack Process and Prevention

Detecting MITM Attacks

It proves challenging to identify MITM attacks due to attacker efforts of remaining undetected. Several detection strategies along with specific tools exist to identify these threats.

1. Certificate Pinning : A website develops a special association with a specific security certificate under this detection approach. An unanticipated change in the certificate should be considered as a sign of a potential MITM attack.

2. SSL/TLS Monitoring : Reporting changes in SSL/TLS certificates through regular inspection allows organizations to discover MITM attacks. Serious warnings should be activated whenever the encryption strength drops abruptly from HTTPS to HTTP[4].

3. Intrusion Detection Systems (IDS): IDS tools serve the purpose of detecting unusual network traffic behaviors by looking for both large traffic fluctuations and suspected unauthorized access actions. Identification of MITM activities becomes possible through these tools which detect both DNS spoofing and irregular examples of traffic redirection[5].

4. Network Traffic Analysis : The detection of MITM attacks becomes possible when organizations review network traffic to identify these interception indications through routing irregularities and packet transmission pattern modifications[5].

Preventing MITM Attacks

Successful prevention of MITM attacks needs both technological implementations and best organizational practices as parts of a proactive method.

1. Use HTTPS and TLS : Data protection can be achieved by encrypting all communication with HTTPS together with TLS (Transport Layer Security). Cyclic updates of SSL certificates help organizations avoid security vulnerabilities.

2. Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) : The integration of 2FA creates two security barriers for improved system protection. Attackers who manage to obtain user credentials would remain unsuccessful because they must also provide the second authentication factor to access the account[6].

3. DNSSEC (DNS Security Extensions) : The DNS security extensions (DNSSEC) protect DNS protocols by defending against website redirection attempts carried out by attackers. DNSSEC verifies DNS responses with cryptographic signatures, so it defends against DNS spoofing attacks[7].

4. Avoid Public Wi-Fi for Sensitive Activities : Shared wireless networks present security vulnerabilities because MITM attacks occur frequently on them. Public Wi-Fi users should refrain from making sensitive transactions or they should install a VPN to protect their traffic.

5. Client-Side Security Measures : The practice of identifying suspicious activities remains essential because users need to understand the detection of untrusted SSL certificates alongside unusual website behaviors. The education of end-users produces powerful results against social engineering attacks which result in MITM.

6 Regular Software Updates: Updates to communication protocols and their timely distribution to servers and clients stop attackers from exploiting known vulnerabilities.

Conclusion

MITM attacks present serious threats to all users and organizations within the digital world of the present era. Security measures which combine protected communication protocols and encryption together with continuous monitoring will minimize the vulnerability to MITM attacks. To protect sensitive information integrity and confidentiality, users need to use preventive measures which include HTTPS implementation with two-factor authentication and training for users. The ongoing evolution of cyber threats demands organizations to maintain their ability to counter MITM attacks for sustaining cybersecurity practices.

References

1. H. Fereidouni, O. Fadeitcheva, and M. Zalai, “IoT and Man-in-the-Middle Attacks,” Aug. 04, 2023, arXiv: arXiv:2308.02479. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.02479.
2. Z. Čekerevac, P. Cekerevac, L. Prigoda, and F. Al-Naima, “SECURITY RISKS FROM THE MODERN MAN-IN-THE-MIDDLE ATTACKS,” MEST J., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 34–51, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.12709/mest.13.13.01.04.
3. M. Narang, A. Jatain, and N. Punetha, “A Survey on Detection of Man-In-The-Middle Attack in IoMT Using Machine Learning Techniques,” in Proceedings of International Conference on Computational Intelligence, R. Tiwari, M. Saraswat, and M. Pavone, Eds., Singapore: Springer Nature, 2024, pp. 117–132. doi: 10.1007/978-981-97-3526-6_10.
4. J. M. Auerbach and L. Zhang, “Navigating Through SSL/TLS Implementation Vulnerabilities in Vehicle-Related iOS Apps,” in 2024 IEEE 3rd International Conference on Computing and Machine Intelligence (ICMI), Apr. 2024, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICMI60790.2024.10586066.
5. M. O.-E. Aoueileyine, N. Karmous, R. Bouallegue, N. Youssef, and A. Yazidi, “Detecting and Mitigating MitM Attack on IoT Devices Using SDN,” in Advanced Information Networking and Applications, L. Barolli, Ed., Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland, 2024, pp. 320–330. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-57942-4_31.
6. O. Ellahi, M. Umer, A. Raza, and K. Rehman, “Analyzing 2FA Phishing Attacks and Their Prevention Techniques,” in 2022 International Conference on Smart Information Systems and Technologies (SIST), Apr. 2022, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/SIST54437.2022.9945766.
7. A. S. Abdullah, “The Implementation Strategy of DNSSEC in Strengthening Digital Government Security in Malaysia,” Asia-Pac. J. Inf. Technol. Multimed., vol. 11, no. 01, pp. 26–38, Jun. 2022, doi: 10.17576/apjitm-2022-1101-03.
8. Rahaman, M., Bakkireddygari, S. S., Chattopadhyay, S., Gomez, A. L., Arya, V., & Bansal, S. (2024). Infrastructure and network security. In Advances in information security, privacy, and ethics book series (pp. 108–144). https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3824-7.ch005
9. Vajrobol, V., Saxena, G. J., Pundir, A., Singh, S., Gupta, B. B., Gaurav, A., & Rahaman, M. (2024). Identify spoofing attacks in Internet of Things (IoT) environments using machine learning algorithms. Journal of High Speed Networks.
10. Zhou, Z., Li, Y., Li, J., Yu, K., Kou, G., Wang, M., & Gupta, B. B. (2022). Gan-siamese network for cross-domain vehicle re-identification in intelligent transport systems. IEEE transactions on network science and engineering, 10(5), 2779-2790.
11. Zheng, Q., Wang, X., Khan, M. K., Zhang, W., Gupta, B. B., & Guo, W. (2017). A lightweight authenticated encryption scheme based on chaotic scml for railway cloud service. IEEE Access, 6, 711-722.
12. Rahaman M. (2025) The Anatomy of a Smishing Attack: Common Techniques and Tactics Used by Cybercriminals, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

Cite As

Karthik V. (2025) How to Detect and Prevent Man-In-The-Middle(MITM) Attacks, Insights2techinfo pp.1

851100cookie-checkHow to Detect and Prevent Man-In-The-Middle(MITM) Attacksyes