NLP Challenges and Innovations in Intelligent Systems

By: 1SHREY MEHRA (email id:

1Department of CSE, Chandigarh College of Engineering and Technology, India


Challenges in NLP are as prevalent as its successes. The article addresses these challenges, including the complexities of language understanding, ethical considerations, and issues related to bias in language models. It also explores challenges in evaluation metrics and model robustness. NLP is poised to play a pivotal role in the development of intelligent systems, language translation, and human-computer interaction, among other applications, presenting an exciting frontier for research and development. This article showcases the extensive reach of NLP in various domains, including machine translation, text categorization, information extraction, summarization, sentiment analysis, and more. In the era of state-of-the-art NLP models, including Bayesian models and neural networks, machines are achieving remarkable fluency in language tasks. This article explores at least five of this ground breaking models, showcasing their contributions and the transformative potential they hold. To assess NLP models accurately, evaluation metrics such as BLEU and GLUE have been developed. However, evaluating the multifaceted nature of language comprehension and generation poses inherent challenges. We delve into these metrics and the ongoing research questions surrounding NLP evaluation.

1. Introduction

Language serves as the cornerstone of human communication, facilitating the expression of thoughts and transmission of ideas. Natural Language Processing (NLP), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), serves as the conduit bridging human language with computational analysis. In this research endeavor, we delve into the contemporary landscape of NLP, illuminating prevalent challenges and envisioning its bright future. Through various projects, we highlight NLP’s profound influence on industries and society at large.

NLP’s progress is closely intertwined with the availability of high-quality datasets, which serve as the lifeblood of model development and training [1-3]. This article will present some of the most influential datasets in NLP and elucidate their significance in advancing the field .The emergence of state-of-the-art NLP models, including Bayesian models and neural networks, has elevated the capabilities of machines in understanding and generating human language [4]. We will discuss at least five of these cutting-edge models and their contributions to the field. Evaluating NLP models is a complex endeavor, and this article will shed light on the metrics and challenges associated with assessing their performance. Metrics like BLEU and GLUE have been developed to gauge NLP model proficiency, but their limitations and ongoing research questions will be explored.

The article is organized as follows: Section 2 discusses common datasets and recent projects. Section 3 discusses the evaluation metrics and challenges involved in NLP. Finally, we conclude the article in Section 4.

2 Datasets & state-of-the-art models

2.1 NLP Datasets

In the realm of Natural Language Processing (NLP), data serves as the lifeblood that fuels the development and evolution of language models, algorithms, and applications. Datasets, in particular, are the foundational building blocks upon which the robustness and effectiveness of NLP systems depend. These datasets encapsulate vast and diverse collections of text, enabling researchers, data scientists, and engineers to train, test, and fine-tune NLP models for a multitude of tasks and applications. From machine translation to sentiment analysis, question-answering to summarization, datasets play a pivotal role in shaping the capabilities and potential of NLP technologies. In this section, some of the datasets in NLP are listed which may help advancing language understanding and generation.

1) Sentiment analysis- Sentiment analysis, also known as opinion mining, determines the sentiment or emotional tone expressed in a piece of text. Some commonly used datasets for sentiment analysis task are:

a) IMDB Reviews: The IMDb dataset consists of movie reviews along with their associated ratings (positive or negative) [5]. It is frequently used for sentiment

analysis and text classification tasks. Researchers and developers use it to build models that can predict sentiment based on textual content.

b) Stanford Sentiment Treebank (SST): SST is a dataset designed for fine-grained sentiment analysis [6]. It includes movie reviews with sentiment labels at both the document and sentence levels, allowing for nuanced sentiment analysis. It contains thousands of movie reviews, sentences, and sentiment annotations. Researchers use SST to develop models that can understand sentiment not only at a document level but also within sentences and phrases.

c) Sentiment 140: The Sentiment140 dataset is a widely used resource in Natural Language Processing (NLP) for binary sentiment analysis. It consists of over 1.6 million tweets labeled as positive (1) or negative (0) sentiment. This dataset is particularly valuable for training and evaluating sentiment analysis models.

2) Language Modeling- Language modeling is a fundamental task in Natural Language Processing (NLP) where the goal is to predict the next word or token in a sequence of text. It serves as the foundation for many NLP applications, including machine translation, text generation, speech recognition, and more. To train robust language models, researchers and developers rely on a variety of datasets that provide large amounts of text data for pretraining and fine-tuning. Here, we explore some prominent language modeling datasets that have played a pivotal role in advancing NLP technologies.

a) WikiText-103: The WikiText-103 dataset is a curated collection of Wikipedia articles that have been split into tokens (103 million)[7]. It is designed for language modeling and includes training, validation, and test sets. Researchers use WikiText to evaluate the performance of language models and conduct experiments in controlled settings.

b) WikiText-2: Wikitext-2 is a widely used language modeling dataset that consists of text from English Wikipedia articles. It is designed for training and evaluating language models, particularly those that focus on predicting the next word or token in a sequence of text. Wikitext-2 is a smaller version of the Wikitext dataset, which was created by scraping and processing Wikipedia articles.

c) LAMBADA: The LAMBADA dataset is a unique and challenging language modeling dataset designed to evaluate a model’s ability to perform language understanding and completion in a real-world context. Unlike traditional language modeling tasks, LAMBADA introduces a twist by requiring models to predict the final word of a sentence but withholding crucial contextual information. This context is only available in the preceding sentences, making the task exceptionally challenging.LAMBADA is a relatively small dataset compared to some other language modeling datasets. It contains around 10,000 passages, with each passage having several sentences [8].

3) Machine Translation- Machine translation datasets are crucial for training and evaluating translation models. They come in various languages, sizes, and domains to support the development of robust translation systems. Here are some notable datasets for machine translation:

a) WMT (Workshop on Machine Translation)2016 Dataset:The WMT datasets are widely used in machine translation research. They include multilingual corpora for various language pairs and domains, such as news, literature, and more[9]. WMT datasets are benchmark datasets for machine translation competitions and research.

b) IWSLT (International Workshop on Spoken Language Translation) Datasets: IWSLT datasets focus on spoken language translation. They include audio data with transcriptions and translations for multiple languages. These datasets are valuable for research in speech-to-text translation and multimodal machine translation.

c) Europarl Parallel Corpus: This dataset consists of parallel texts from the proceedings of the European Parliament[10]. It is commonly used for English-to-European language pairs. It consists of millions of sentences. It serves as a valuable resource for research in European language translation.

4) Question Answering System- Question answering (QA) datasets are essential for training and evaluating QA systems, which aim to provide answers to natural language questions. These datasets vary in complexity, domain, and format. Here are some notable QA datasets:

a) SQuAD (Stanford Question Answering Dataset): SQuAD is a widely used dataset for machine reading comprehension. It consists of paragraphs from Wikipedia articles, with each paragraph accompanied by questions about its content. The goal is to provide answers to these questions from the given text. SQuAD versions include SQuAD 1.1 and SQuAD 2.0[11], with different characteristics and sizes. SQuAD has been instrumental in the development and evaluation of QA models, including those based on machine learning and deep learning.

b) MS MARCO (Microsoft MAchine Reading COmprehension): MS MARCO includes a collection of real user queries from the Bing search engine[12]. It provides both passage ranking and QA tasks, where the goal is to answer questions based on passages. It features a substantial amount of search queries and passages. MS MARCO supports research in web-based QA and passage retrieval.

c) TriviaQA: TriviaQA is a dataset that focuses on answering questions with trivia-style questions[13]. It includes questions sourced from trivia websites and provides answers in various formats, such as sentences and paragraphs. Contains

a diverse set of questions and answers. TriviaQA is used to assess QA systems’ ability to answer a wide range of factual questions.

These datasets have played a significant role in advancing NLP research and applications, serving as benchmarks for evaluating and improving models and algorithms in various language-related tasks.

2.2 State-of-art models

Some of the state-of-art models used in NLP are:

a) BERT (Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers) [14]: BERT, which stands for Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers, is a landmark natural language processing (NLP) model introduced by researchers at Google AI in 2018. What makes BERT groundbreaking is its ability to capture context from both directions in a sentence, enabling it to deeply understand language. Unlike previous models that processed text in a unidirectional manner, BERT is bidirectional. During pre-training, it learns to predict missing words in sentences using a massive corpus of text data. This dual-context approach results in contextual word embeddings that are exceptionally rich in meaning. BERT utilizes the Transformer architecture, which employs self-attention mechanisms to weigh the importance of different words in a sentence. After pre-training, BERT can be fine-tuned for specific NLP tasks like text classification, question answering, and sentiment analysis. Its significance in NLP lies in its ability to achieve state-of-the-art performance across a wide range of tasks and its versatility for various applications.

b) GPT (Generative Pre-trained Transformer) [15]:

GPT, developed by OpenAI, represents a family of models, with GPT-3 being the most prominent version. These models are designed for text generation and understanding. GPT models, like GPT-3, are pre-trained on massive text corpora, and they excel at generating human-like text based on given prompts. GPT-3, in particular, boasts an impressive 175 billion parameters. What sets GPT models apart is their autoregressive generation approach, where they predict the next word based on the preceding context, making them proficient at generating coherent, contextually relevant text. GPT-3 has gained acclaim for its zero-shot and few-shot learning capabilities, meaning it can perform tasks for which it wasn’t explicitly trained with minimal examples or prompts. This versatility has led to its adoption in various applications, from chatbots and content generation to language translation and summarization. The GPT family has seen multiple iterations, with each version pushing the boundaries of AI language models, showcasing their potential in natural language understanding and generation tasks.

c) Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs)[16]:

BNNs combine neural networks with Bayesian inference. They can provide uncertainty estimates, which is crucial in applications like medical diagnosis and autonomous vehicles, where understanding model confidence is vital. Bayesian BERT, which extends BERT with Bayesian methods, aims to provide probabilistic outputs, making it useful for tasks where uncertainty quantification is important, such as in medical NLP applications.In the context of Bayesian BERT, uncertainty quantification means that the model doesn’t just provide a single, deterministic output; it offers a range of probable outputs along with their associated probabilities. This probabilistic approach enhances the safety and reliability of decision-making processes. For instance, when diagnosing a medical condition, instead of a binary “yes” or “no” answer, Bayesian BERT can express its confidence in the diagnosis as a probability distribution. This nuanced insight allows healthcare professionals to make more informed decisions, potentially leading to better patient outcomes.

d) XLNet[17]:

XLNet, a breakthrough in natural language processing (NLP) developed by Google AI, merges the strengths of the Transformer architecture and autoregressive pretraining. This combination results in an adaptable and high-performing language model. Unlike conventional models, XLNet considers all word permutations in a sentence, enabling it to capture extensive contextual information. This permutation-based training encourages bidirectional dependency understanding. Known for its exceptional performance across various NLP tasks, XLNet excels in machine translation, text classification, question answering, and more. Its generalization capabilities allow for efficient fine-tuning on specific tasks, making it valuable for a wide array of applications. Being open-source, XLNet has become a prominent resource for the NLP community, driving advancements and setting new standards in language understanding and generation.

e) PALM (Pre-trained Aggregative Language Model)[18]

It represents a significant advancement in the field of natural language processing (NLP). It excels at integrating the capabilities of multiple pre-trained models, such as BERT, RoBERTa, and XLNet, to provide enhanced NLP performance. PALM’s strength lies in its ability to aggregate information effectively from these models, resulting in comprehensive contextual understanding. One standout feature of PALM is its remarkable generalization ability. It can be fine-tuned for specific NLP tasks with relatively small task-specific datasets, making it adaptable and versatile across a wide spectrum of applications, including text classification, sentiment analysis, and named entity recognition.

Moreover, PALM is tailored for multilingual support. It has been pre-trained on diverse languages, making it proficient in cross-lingual tasks and suitable for languages with limited NLP resources. This global applicability ensures its relevance in a linguistically diverse world. Additionally, PALM incorporates techniques for efficient model compression, reducing memory and computational requirements while maintaining performance. This resource-efficient design facilitates deployment in scenarios with limited computing resources, including edge devices and resource-constrained environments.

3. Evaluation metrics and Challenges

This section explores the evaluation metrics, challenges involved and the future opportunities in the field of NLP:

3.1 Evaluation metrics

Evaluation metrics in Natural Language Processing (NLP) play a crucial role in assessing the performance of various NLP tasks and systems. These metrics provide quantitative measures that help researchers, developers, and practitioners gauge how well a particular NLP model or algorithm performs on a given task. Proper evaluation metrics are essential for comparing different models, selecting the best-performing one, and tracking progress in the field.

Effective evaluation in NLP is challenging due to the inherent complexity of human language. Language is highly nuanced, context-dependent, and often ambiguous. Therefore, NLP evaluation metrics must strike a balance between simplicity and capturing the intricacies of language understanding and generation.

Two widely used evaluation metrics in NLP are BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) and GLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation). These metrics are employed in different contexts and address distinct aspects of NLP evaluation.

a) BLEU (Bilingual Evaluation Understudy) [19]: BLEU is an evaluation metric primarily used in machine translation tasks. It was introduced as a way to measure the quality of machine-generated translations by comparing them to human reference translations. BLEU assesses the precision of the machine-generated output by counting how many of its n-grams (subsequences of n consecutive words) appear in the reference translations.

Key features of BLEU:

  1. N-gram Precision: BLEU calculates precision scores for n-grams of different lengths (typically up to 4-grams) in the machine-generated output compared to reference translations. This assesses how well the model captures local phrase-level similarities.
  2. Brevity Penalty: To discourage models from producing overly short translations, BLEU includes a brevity penalty. It penalizes translations that are significantly shorter than the reference translations.
  3. Cumulative BLEU: BLEU can be calculated using different n-gram lengths (e.g., 1-gram, 2-gram, 3-gram, 4-gram). The cumulative BLEU score combines these scores to provide a comprehensive evaluation, giving more weight to longer n-grams.

Limitations of BLEU:

  1. Lack of Semantic Understanding: BLEU focuses on surface-level text matching and doesn’t consider the semantic correctness of translations. A translation can receive a high BLEU score even if it lacks fluency or correct meaning.
  2. Insensitive to Word Order: BLEU treats word order variations as errors, making it less suitable for languages with flexible word order.

b) GLUE (General Language Understanding Evaluation)[20]: GLUE is an evaluation benchmark designed to assess the performance of models on a wide range of natural language understanding tasks. It encompasses tasks such as text classification, sentence similarity, question answering, and sentiment analysis. GLUE provides a single score that summarizes a model’s overall performance across multiple NLP tasks.

Key features of GLUE: Task Diversity: GLUE includes a diverse set of tasks, each with its evaluation dataset. This diversity tests a model’s ability to generalize across different NLP challenges. ● Single Metric: GLUE aggregates results from various tasks into a single score, allowing easy model comparison. The higher the GLUE score, the better the model’s general NLP understanding.

Limitations of GLUE:

  1. Single Score Simplification: While GLUE simplifies the evaluation process by providing a single score, it may not capture the nuances of each individual NLP task. A model excelling in one task might perform poorly in another.
  2. Limited to Specific Tasks: GLUE focuses on specific tasks and may not cover all aspects of natural language understanding, limiting its applicability to broader NLP challenges.

BLEU is a specialized metric for machine translation, while GLUE serves as a broad evaluation benchmark for general language understanding tasks. Both metrics play crucial roles in assessing NLP systems, but their applicability depends on the specific task and context of evaluation. Researchers and practitioners often use a combination of metrics to gain a comprehensive understanding of an NLP model’s performance.

3.2 Challenges

Natural Language Processing (NLP) is a dynamic and rapidly evolving field that has made significant advancements in recent years. However, it also faces several substantial challenges. These challenges are inherent to the complexity of human language and the ever-expanding scope of NLP applications. In this section, we delve into the key challenges in NLP that researchers, developers, and practitioners are actively working to address.

1. Ambiguity and Context Understanding:

Issue: Natural language is inherently ambiguous, and word meanings often depend on context. NLP systems struggle to accurately disambiguate words and phrases, which can lead to incorrect interpretations.

Challenge: Developing models that can understand context and resolve ambiguity is a fundamental challenge. This involves incorporating world knowledge and reasoning abilities into NLP systems.

2. Lack of Data and Resources for Low-Resource Languages:

Issue: The majority of NLP research and resources are focused on high-resource languages, leaving low-resource languages underrepresented. This digital language divide limits the accessibility of NLP technology to diverse linguistic communities.

Challenge: Bridging the gap by creating datasets, models, and tools for low-resource languages is a priority. It requires innovative approaches and collaborations with linguists and local communities.

3. Bias and Fairness:

Issue: NLP models can inherit and perpetuate biases present in training data. Biased models can lead to discriminatory or unfair outcomes, affecting marginalized communities. Challenge: Developing bias-aware NLP models, curating diverse and representative datasets, and implementing fairness-aware evaluation metrics are crucial steps to mitigate bias and ensure fairness in NLP systems.

4. Understanding and Generating Human Emotion:

Issue: Capturing and generating human emotions accurately in text is challenging. Emotions are complex and context-dependent, making it difficult for NLP models to recognize and respond to emotional cues effectively.

Challenge: Advancing sentiment analysis and emotion recognition techniques, along with creating emotion-aware chatbots and conversational agents, is a frontier in NLP.

5. Multimodal Understanding:

Issue: Language is often combined with other modalities like images, audio, and video. Integrating these modalities to create comprehensive understanding remains a challenge. Challenge: Developing models that can effectively process and combine information from multiple modalities is essential for tasks like image captioning, video summarization, and more.

6. Explainability and Interpretability:

Issue: Complex NLP models, especially deep learning models, are often considered black boxes, making it challenging to understand their decision-making processes.

Challenge: Research in explainable AI (XAI) aims to make NLP models more transparent and interpretable, enabling users to trust and understand model predictions.

7. Multilingual NLP:

Issue: Extending NLP capabilities to a diverse range of languages is essential, but it presents challenges due to variations in syntax, morphology, and script.

Challenge: Developing robust multilingual models and resources that can handle a wide array of languages and dialects is a priority for global accessibility and communication.

8. Data Privacy and Ethical Concerns:

Issue: NLP models can extract sensitive information from text data, raising privacy concerns. Ethical dilemmas also emerge when using NLP for applications like content generation and content moderation.

Challenge: Striking a balance between harnessing the power of NLP and ensuring privacy and ethical use requires the development of robust data privacy techniques and ethical guidelines.

9. Handling Rare and Out-of-Distribution Data:

Issue: NLP models often struggle with rare or out-of-distribution data, leading to errors when faced with novel inputs.

Challenge: Improving the generalization capabilities of NLP models to handle rare and unexpected inputs is a critical research challenge.

10. Scaling and Efficiency:

Issue: The demand for larger and more complex NLP models places a strain on computational resources and energy consumption.

Challenge: Developing techniques to create efficient, scalable, and environmentally sustainable NLP models is crucial for the long-term viability of the field.

Addressing these challenges requires collaborative efforts from the NLP research community, industry, and policymakers. Tackling these issues will not only advance the capabilities of NLP but also ensure its responsible and equitable use in various domains.

4. Conclusion

This article has strived to achieve few objectives that collectively shed light on the intricate world of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and its applications. One of the objectives revolved around datasets, approaches, and evaluation metrics used in NLP. By examining the core building blocks of NLP research, solid reference was provided for researchers and practitioners alike, facilitating their work in advancing the field. Throughout this article, we discussed existing literature, highlighted significant findings, and showcased important applications and projects within the realm of NLP. This comprehensive overview not only serves as a valuable literature survey for those already immersed in NLP but also motivates and inspires further exploration in the domains and topics discussed. It is worth noting that while NLP has seen extensive research and development, there remains a notable gap when it comes to the application of NLP techniques to regional languages. This uncharted territory presents a promising avenue for future research, offering the potential to bridge linguistic and cultural gaps and extend the reach and impact of NLP to previously underserved communities.


  1. Parupalli, S., Rao, V. A., & Mamidi, R. (2018). BCSAT: A Benchmark Corpus for Sentiment Analysis in Telugu Using Word-level Annotations (arXiv:1807.01679). arXiv.
  2. Choudhary, N. (2021). LDC-IL: The Indian repository of resources for language technology. Language Resources and Evaluation55(3), 855-867.
  3. Marcus MP, Marcinkiewicz MA, Santorini B (1993) Building a large annotated corpus of english: the penn treebank. Comput Linguist 19(2):313–330
  4. Liu, Y., & Zhang, M. (2018). Neural network methods for natural language processing.
  5. Maas, A. L., Daly, R. E., Pham, P. T., Huang, D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2011). Learning Word Vectors for Sentiment Analysis. Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, 142–150.
  6. Socher, R., Perelygin, A., Wu, J., Chuang, J., Manning, C. D., Ng, A. Y., & Potts, C. (2013, October). Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (pp. 1631-1642).
  7. Articles with code – wikitext-103 dataset. Dataset | Articles With Code.
  8. Articleno, D., Kruszewski, G., Lazaridou, A., Pham, Q. N., Bernardi, R., Pezzelle, S., Baroni, M., Boleda, G., & Fernández, R. (2016). The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse context (arXiv:1606.06031). arXiv.
  9. Bojar, O., Chatterjee, R., Federmann, C., Graham, Y., Haddow, B., Huck, M., Jimeno Yepes, A., Koehn, P., Logacheva, V., Monz, C., Negri, M., Névéol, A., Neves, M., Popel, M., Post, M., Rubino, R., Scarton, C., Specia, L., Turchi, M., … Zampieri, M. (2016). Findings of the 2016 Conference on Machine Translation. Proceedings of the First Conference on Machine Translation: Volume 2, Shared Task Articles, 131–198.
  10. Koehn, P. (2005). Europarl: A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine Translation. Proceedings of Machine Translation Summit X: Articles, 79–86.
  11. Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., & Liang, P. (2018). Know What You Don’t Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuAD (arXiv:1806.03822). arXiv.
  12. Bajaj, P., Campos, D., Craswell, N., Deng, L., Gao, J., Liu, X., Majumder, R., McNamara, A., Mitra, B., Nguyen, T., Rosenberg, M., Song, X., Stoica, A., Tiwary, S., & Wang, T. (2018). MS MARCO: A Human Generated MAchine Reading COmprehension Dataset (arXiv:1611.09268; Version 3). arXiv.
  13. Joshi, M., Choi, E., Weld, D. S., & Zettlemoyer, L. (2017). TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehension (arXiv:1705.03551; Version 2). arXiv.
  14. Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding (arXiv:1810.04805; Version 2). arXiv.
  15. Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., … Amodei, D. (2020). Language Models are Few-Shot Learners (arXiv:2005.14165; Version 4). arXiv.
  16. Miok, K., Škrlj, B., Zaharie, D., & Šikonja, M. R. Bayesian BERT for Trustful Hate Speech Detection.
  17. Yang, Z., Dai, Z., Yang, Y., Carbonell, J., Salakhutdinov, R., & Le, Q. V. (2020). XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understanding (arXiv:1906.08237; Version 2). arXiv.
  18. Bi, B., Li, C., Wu, C., Yan, M., Wang, W., Huang, S., Huang, F., & Si, L. (2020). PALM: Pre-training an Autoencoding&Autoregressive Language Model for Context-conditioned Generation (arXiv:2004.07159; Version 2). arXiv.
  19. Law, K. M., Ip, A. W., Gupta, B. B., & Geng, S. (Eds.). (2021). Managing IoT and mobile technologies with innovation, trust, and sustainable computing. CRC Press.
  20. Li, K. C., et al. (2020). Recent advances in security, privacy, and trust for internet of things (IoT) and cyber-physical systems (CPS). CRC Press.
  21. Papineni, K., Roukos, S., Ward, T., & Zhu, W.-J. (2002). Bleu: A Method for Automatic Evaluation of Machine Translation. Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 311–318.
  22. Wang, A., Singh, A., Michael, J., Hill, F., Levy, O., & Bowman, S. (2018). GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understanding. Proceedings of the 2018 EMNLP Workshop BlackboxNLP: Analyzing and Interpreting Neural Networks for NLP, 353–355.
  23. REDDY K.T (2023) NLP in Cybersecurity: Analyzing Phishing Emails for Enhanced Protection, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1
  24. Brijith A. (2023) Natural Language Processing (NLP): Harnessing its Potential, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

Cite As

Mehara S (2024) NLP Challenges and Innovations in Intelligent Systems, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

70860cookie-checkNLP Challenges and Innovations in Intelligent Systems
Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.