By: K. Sai Spoorthi, Department of computer science and engineering, Student of computer science and engineering, Madanapalle Institute of Technology and Science, 517325, Angallu, Andhra Pradesh.
Abstract
AI is generative at a very fast rate cuts across most fields and that is why there are question marks on what generative AI comprise of and the unique risks associated with it. The concern of this paper is to address the problem of the use of generative AI and its dangers that pose threats to ethics, societies and privacy through deep fakes, fake news, and eroding trust. Therefore, the present work demonstrates that these technologies are controversial concerning the loss of democracy, growing social inequality, and privacy infringement. Because of this, it raises the question of whether; optimal ethical standards, legal precautions, and collaboration are achievable to help in preventing such risks. Also, questions are raised about the legibility and sustainable application of generative AI models regarding plagiarism and in turn, the paper discusses the imperative of setting rules for the application of generative AI models in learning. For this reason, the research emphasises the importance of ensuring that creativity is directed towards efforts that will endeavour to reduce the negative impact of using generative AI to the lowest level possible and, in the same breath, maximising on the positive impacts to the highest level possible.
Key words: Generative AI, Deepfakes, Academic Integrity, Legal Frameworks, Misinformation, Privacy
Introduction
AI in the generative paradigm has significantly transformed different domains – from arts to science – as new technologies have progressed exponentially. Nevertheless, along with such potentials emerged certain concerns about the usage of such potent tools and their moral effects. Today, if generative AI systems are highly advanced and can generate the work like human creativity and intelligence, then the issues related with credibility, authorship, and even exploitation arises. In this way, by explaining both the virtues and vices of generative AI, this essay attempts to shed light on the task that politicians, engineers, and ordinary people have in front of them as they try to understand the world of the future and their place in it. [1]Finally, the awareness of various social aspects of generative AI will be instrumental for its positive application and will help to limit the negative impact of this technology, the availability of which should be subordinate to the European ethic and human values.
Generative AI and its Rapid Advancements
Some of these are the major milestones of generative AI over the years and the effect on numerous fields especially on the learning and medical ones. The different machine learning technologies have now offered nearly perfect textual, image and even video recreations that in one way or the other have led to the enhancement of some process and productivity. For instance, various learning institutions are researching potential methods of integrating Generative AI such as the ChatGPT in the learning activities. The best predicted impact, conversely, makes way for a more urgent issue – the state of academic integrity. As the above empirical evidence suggest, teachers particularly those who instruct language and communication do not have the appropriate readiness to seize the instruments for positive uses, and at the same time, completely refrain from negative uses. When such distinctions are made the educators begin to discover the capabilities of these technologies and the ethical aspect of using them Once these distinctions are made it becomes necessary to press on for the formulation of robust frameworks that will consider how these technologies will be used and how to avoid some of the common vices. [2]That is why the solving these challenges needs the synergy approach which will include all the proper ethical considerations into the application of Generative AI.
Misuses of Generative AI
The use generative AI remains one of the most talked about issues with regards to ethical issues ranging from its use in creating fake or false news to its use in generating abusive contents. For example, the technology can create near-photorealistic deep fake videos that influence people and events and therefore reality. This capability inherently has a lot of potential dangers in the case of political discussions providing people with fake information affecting the opinion and thus leading to destabilization of elections, thus, democracy. Moreover, abusive content that can be generated by generative AI includes, for example, deceitful phishing scams or nasty concentrate on susceptible groups that threatens not only individual privacy but intensifies social fragmentation. Thus, using these generative capabilities, various threats like spreading of fear and misinformation, and building the basis for distrust can be seen, which equally shows the fine line between using AI for progress and preserving the societal values. Thus, the consequences of these misuses require an understanding of AI’s proper application call for a sound model providing guidelines for the corresponding deployment.
Creation of Deepfakes and Misinformation
Newer forms of artificial intelligence have made it possible to produce deepfakes—the production of audio and video content that looks and sounds as real as any genuine material. Regarding the appropriateness of this technological advancement, there are some critical ethical issues that arise in its use like spreading of wrong information. Lately deepfakes became available for anyone with only basic technical knowledge, how they threaten the credibility of media and thus content, making it difficult to distinguish reliable information from a fake one. The consequences are not just the manipulation of one single user: spreading fake information ranging from elections results to the biased presentation of events and persons, can destabilize communities and therefore endanger the democratic process. Furthermore, the emotional effect of coming across deepfakes undermines the credibility of formal organisations, making people more vulnerable to tricks and fake news. Consequently, proper analysis of the possible dangers which may be posed by the deepfake technology and trying to minimize them are essential to prevent distorting the truth in the digital world.
Ethical and Societal Risks
Still, as the generative AI technology emerges, it is becoming entangled with ethical and social issues requiring a lot of research. The opportunities that the new technology opens up for creating content are vast and all of them are somewhat questionable, contributing to the creation of fake news and revealing the potential for theft of materials that people would like to put under the copyright and distrust many types of media. For instance, deepfakes can deceive the society in relation to the events of their interests and exercise control over their opinions in the process of democratisation. Moreover, these capabilities could also rejuvenate prejudices if the datasets to generate the AI solutions are badly chosen or not precisely moderated in this context the effects are borne mainly in the minorities.[3] Impact does not stop at misrepresentation but extends to the economic effects as the output of AI may go through the artisanal economy eradicating traditional employment. In this way, eradicating these ethical issues entails improving the legal and regulatory structures to provide and regulate the application of AI solutions across sectors together with raising public awareness on proper application of the Artificial Intelligence solutions.
Implications for Privacy and Surveillance
The developing generative AI systems raise fundamental and without boundary questions and concerns of privacy and control, which call for developing ethical frameworks all-inclusiveness. As surveillance systems are changing and developing slowly into the AI-supported ones, there is a chance to encounter status-sensitive violations of privacy. The growing interest in privacy protection strategies gives one cause to wonder about sound approaches to data in a way that promotes the right sort of surveillance progression. Furthermore, AI research synthesis shows a broad concern with the impact of AI in the disciplines and in the life domains alongside the technical-developmental relationship of those technologies with privacy .[4] Hence, as shown in fig1, it is crucial to devote more time to what can become a set of negative consequences of generative AI applications, including those in healthcare and BI. At best, it is only possible to glean implications about these implications from these two sources based on the interaction and cooperation of researchers, policymakers, and technologists in safeguarding people’s rights from the unrelenting advancement of surveillance.
Risks and Recommendations for Mitigation
Some of the several industries where generative AI is getting integrated pose risks that should be dealt with, and this makes this have a dangerous vibe. Some of the most concerning are the post-s selectively relevant to data and knowledge, and where technology and AI can involve disinformation, bias, prejudice, in information flows, that deepen social injustices and hinder equal access to accurate information. Organisations should therefore undertake an approach that elevates the ethical usage of AI, there should be disclosure of how the AI decision making is being done and there should be a check for new negative consequences. However, it is her for convening technologist, ethicists, and policymaker who can sit together and review the risks and then think of the right measures to take since the risks may not be in one niche.[5] Under education interventions that has the aim of improving user competencies in the use of internet it equally has capacity to make people equipped ones again to properly evaluate the output produced by the artificial intelligence to check on formation of fake news. Finally, what it suggests is a positive, integrative model where practitioners of various disciplines can harness all the possibilities that the generative AI offers yet avoid exposing themselves to its threats.
Conclusion
The discussion of specific misuse and risks of generating AI and the related consequences identified important subjects and areas in different sectors, especially in the service organizations and the higher education. Thus, as disclosed by the recent literature, the major obstacles to the appropriate implementation of generative AI tools refer to the ethical issues, privacy concerns, and legal ambiguity, which hamper the generation of innovations. Still, in the sphere of education, students’ perceptions of generative AIs in academic integrity pose questions on the future of assessments. It is established from the study that a significant number of students engage in the use of AI tools while are unaware that they are cheating resulting to a complicated academic assessment scenario. Thus, as shown in fig 2, it is essential to establish transparent guidelines that also can speak about ethical issues and make proper modifications to the assessment designs for using generative AI sensibly by the institutions. In conclusion, it is possible to state that, in general, the application of these technologies must be concorded for their benefits to be maximized while possibility negative facets are being minimized.
References
- F. Eiras et al., “Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI,” May 29, 2024, arXiv: arXiv:2405.08597. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.08597.
- T. Haksoro, A. S. Aisjah, Sreerakuvandana, M. Rahaman, and T. R. Biyanto, “Enhancing Techno Economic Efficiency of FTC Distillation Using Cloud-Based Stochastic Algorithm,” Int. J. Cloud Appl. Comput. IJCAC, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 1–16, Jan. 2023, doi: 10.4018/IJCAC.332408.
- M. Gupta, C. Akiri, K. Aryal, E. Parker, and L. Praharaj, “From ChatGPT to ThreatGPT: Impact of Generative AI in Cybersecurity and Privacy,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 80218–80245, 2023, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3300381.
- H. Xu, Y. Li, O. Balogun, S. Wu, Y. Wang, and Z. Cai, “Security Risks Concerns of Generative AI in the IoT,” IEEE Internet Things Mag., vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 62–67, May 2024, doi: 10.1109/IOTM.001.2400004.
- M. Rahaman et al., “Utilizing Random Forest Algorithm for Sentiment Prediction Based on Twitter Data,” 2022, pp. 446–456. doi: 10.2991/978-94-6463-084-8_37.
- Li, K. C., Gupta, B. B., & Agrawal, D. P. (Eds.). (2020). Recent advances in security, privacy, and trust for internet of things (IoT) and cyber-physical systems (CPS).
- Chaudhary, P., Gupta, B. B., Choi, C., & Chui, K. T. (2020). Xsspro: Xss attack detection proxy to defend social networking platforms. In Computational Data and Social Networks: 9th International Conference, CSoNet 2020, Dallas, TX, USA, December 11–13, 2020, Proceedings 9 (pp. 411-422). Springer International Publishing.
Cite As
Spoorthi K.S. (2024) Generative AI: Potential Misuses and Risks, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1