By: Gonipalli Bharath Vel Tech University, Chennai, India International Center for AI and Cyber Security Research and Innovations, Asia University, Taiwan, Gmail: gonipallibharath@gmail.com
Abstract:
The widespread Internet threat of Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS) attacks heavily disrupts network functions because it creates substantial financial harm and reputational damage. Defensive processes from past years have an inadequate ability to match the development of modern cyberattacks. Real-time exams use computational intelligence (ML) to analyze network traffic and find problematic trends. The piece analyzes how DDoS attack mitigation works when ML uses anomaly detection alongside classification models and automated response protocols. The document includes an ML-based DDoS mitigation process together with a traditional approach comparison table versus ML-based methods.
Introduction:
The network resources of victims become inaccessible to their legitimate users when attackers perform DDoS attacks that utilize excessive traffic flooding to create an overwhelming condition. Security systems operate as effective barriers against conventional defense measures due to which attackers combine sophisticated approaches with botnets to achieve their objectives[1]. The recent variations of cyberattacks defeat traditional defense tools including firewalls and rate limits together with signature-based detection methods[2]. The intelligent system can learn autonomously to stop and protect against DDoS attacks through its ability to view patterns for normal and malicious traffic during real-time active responses[3].
Machine Learning Approach to DDoS Mitigation:
- Data Collection:
Security operators must acquire network traffic information by extracting it from different data sources which include system logs and NetFlow reports and intrusion detection systems data[4]. The data collection process includes extraction of packet rate along with source IP behavior and protocol types and the characteristics of network payloads.
- Feature Engineering:
The preparatory step of data processing includes staging data normalization alongside filtering techniques that eliminate unneeded information. The algorithm selects fundamental features that include packet per second (PPS) alongside byte per second (BPS) and entropy values[5].
- Model Selection and Training:
Two main categories exist:
First are supervised learning models including Decision Trees, Random Forest, and SVM and the second includes deep learning models including LSTMs and CNNs that perform traffic classification after training. Together with unsupervised learning algorithms (clustering and anomaly detection) detection of unknown attack patterns in the system becomes possible.
- Real-Time Detection and Response:
The developed model operates in real time to inspect network traffic. The system implements immediate blocking of IPs and rates the system’s limitation feature once it detects an attack pattern.
ML-Based DDoS Attack Mitigation Process
Comparative Table: Traditional vs. ML-Based DDoS Mitigation
Aspect | Traditional Methods | ML-Based Methods |
Detection Speed | Slow | Fast (Real-time) |
Adaptability | Limited (Rule-based) | Adaptive (Leaving new attacks) |
Accuracy | Moderate | High (Improves over time) |
False Positives | High | Low (Better Classification) |
Automation | Manual Intervention | Automated response |
Conclusion:
Machine learning provides an innovative way of responding to DDoS attacks through real-time detection, high flexibility, and automated response. Unlike traditional techniques based on predefined signatures, ML continuously learns and adapts to detect new threats. Implementation of ML-based cybersecurity solutions increases network resilience and offers better protection against dynamic cyber threats.
References:
- T. Al-Shurbaji et al., “Deep Learning-Based Intrusion Detection System for Detecting IoT Botnet Attacks: A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 11792–11822, 2025, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2025.3526711.
- P. A. Marengo and D. A. Pagano, “MACHINE LEARNING FOR CYBERSECURITY FOR DETECTING AND PREVENTING CYBER ATTACKS,” Mach. Intell. Res., vol. 18, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Aug. 2024.
- A. B. de Neira, A. M. de Araujo, and M. Nogueira, “An Intelligent System for DDoS Attack Prediction Based on Early Warning Signals,” IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manag., vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 1254–1266, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.1109/TNSM.2022.3223881.
- M. Komisarek, M. Pawlicki, R. Kozik, W. Hołubowicz, and M. Choraś, “How to Effectively Collect and Process Network Data for Intrusion Detection?,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 11, Art. no. 11, Nov. 2021, doi: 10.3390/e23111532.
- S. Dong and Y. Xia, “Network traffic identification in packet sampling environment,” Digit. Commun. Netw., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 957–970, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.dcan.2022.02.003.
- Mirsadeghi, F., Rafsanjani, M. K., & Gupta, B. B. (2021). A trust infrastructure based authentication method for clustered vehicular ad hoc networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications, 14, 2537-2553.
- AlZu’bi, S., Shehab, M., Al-Ayyoub, M., Jararweh, Y., & Gupta, B. (2020). Parallel implementation for 3d medical volume fuzzy segmentation. Pattern Recognition Letters, 130, 312-318.
- Tiwari H. (2023) Defending Against DDoS Attacks: A Comprehensive Guide to vDDoS Protection tool, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1
Cite As
Bharath G. (2025) Mitigating DDoS Attacks with Machine Learning: A Cybersecurity Breakthrough, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1