Cloud Computing vs. DDoS: Are Cloud-Based Solutions Enough?

By: Gonipalli Bharath Vel Tech University, Chennai, India International Center for AI and Cyber Security Research and Innovations, Asia University, Taiwan, Gmail: gonipallibharath@gmail.com

Abstract:

Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attack method functions through the use of malicious traffic in order to scatter damage on web services and break down network and server infrastructure. The current organizations are looking to cloud security tools because they are utilizing cloud computing solutions for their increasing use. There still exists some ambiguity regarding whether mechanisms of cloud security are actually enough or not. Cloud-based analysis of DDoS mitigation is carried out within this paper in order to determine their defense capacities as well as their own weak and strong points and their potential complementary methods towards defense policies. The research compares by analysis if companies ought to have cloud solutions alone or couple them with hybrid systems for comprehensive protection.

1.Introduction:

Distributed Denial of Service attack targets victim systems through exhaustion of resources which obstructs valid user accessibility. The struggle of on-site security systems against big-scale attacks resulted in cloud-based mitigation solutions emerging as the effective response strategy[1]. Cloud security providers deliver flexible defense options to clients although users maintain doubts about their performance quality and financial costs as well as their reliance on the system[2]. The following information explores the main elements of cloud-based DDoS mitigation together with the advantages and difficulties such systems present.

Fig (i): DDoS attack Traffic

2.DDoS mitigation system based in cloud infrastructure has the following operational process:

The operation of cloud-based Defense against Distributed Denial of Service attacks functions by sending network traffic to cloud scrubbing centers where attackers’ traffic is eliminated while legitimate requests continue to the target infrastructure:

  • Traffic Monitoring: Artificial Intelligence along with behavior analysis helps organizations monitor traffic through its Traffic Monitoring system where they identify unusual fluctuations[3].
  • Traffic Diversion: Cloud-based scrubbing servers receive traffic diverts from suspicious traffic to prevent it from accessing the organization’s infrastructure[4].
  • Filtering & Mitigation: A two-step process of filtering and mitigation functions to stop dangerous traffic while permitting valid requests examines both signatures of known threats and anomalous activity[5].
  • Adaptive Response: AI-based algorithm utilization allows for continuous optimization of security detection and response through adaptive processes that adapt to evolving attack vectors[6].
  • Load Balancing: Service continuity with the avoidance of outages remains possible through load balancing products that spread real traffic across multiple data centers[7].

3.Flowchart of Cloud-Based DDoS Mitigation Process:

Fig (ii): Flowchart of cloud-based-DDoS Mitigation Process

4.Effectiveness of Cloud-Based Solutions:

Cloud-based mitigation provides several advantages:

  • Scalability: Cloud infrastructure demonstrates ability to dynamically scale resources to handle big attack volumes because of its scalability feature.
  • Real-Time Protection: AI analytics system used for real-time protection detects threats quickly which reduces the impact of attacks before critical infrastructure becomes involved.
  • Global Network Redundancy: Cloud providers protect service continuity through a network of dispersed data centers which operate in case of major attacks.
  • Cost-Efficiency: The subscription-based approach lowers framework expenses by eliminating the operational necessity for upgrading physical server systems.
  • Ease of Deployment: The implementation of cloud-based solutions becomes simple for organizations because they connect seamlessly to their existing systems with low support requirements.
  • Automated Threat Intelligence: Cloud-based security providers can improve threat mitigation strategies by implementing threat intelligence procedures that immediately track data from multiple sources in immediate form.

5. Limitations of Cloud-Based DDoS Mitigation:

Although cloud-based solutions remain effective, there are certain design restrictions.

  • Latency Issues: Some time-critical applications could experience delays because of traffic redirection through DDoS protection services.
  • False Positives: False Positive Events Result When Defense Mechanisms Block Lawful Users Because of Intense Filtering Rules Thus Creating Unpleasant Experience Issues.
  • Cost Concerns: High traffic filtering during DDoS attacks can result in elevated costs for organizations because of the prolonged duration of the events.
  • Single-Point Dependency: When organizations depend exclusively on cloud providers for their security needs the risk grows because outages at provider sites affect entire network security.
  • Limited Control: The implementation of exclusive cloud solutions offers organizations limited security control capabilities than hybrid or on-premise solutions.
  • Compliance & Data Privacy Risks: Short and long-term data compliance regulations pose challenges for certain industries that transfer their security functions to external cloud providers.

6.Cloud-Based Vs. Hybrid DDoS Mitigation Comparison:

Using a hybrid strategy that blends cloud-based and on-premises technologies can improve security. The following table contrasts these tactics:

Feature

Cloud-Based Mitigation

Hybrid Mitigation

Scalability

High

Moderate-High

Response Speed

Fast

Faster (Localized response)

Cost

Subscription-based

Higher initial cost but cost-effective in long run

Latency

Possible delays

Minimal delays

Security coverage

Strong but dependent on provider

More comprehensive

Control Over Data

Limited

Higher control

Compliance

Dependent on Cloud provider policies

Easier to comply with regulations

7.Conclusion:

Even with highly durable cloud-based DDoS mitigation, there is no silver bullet. It’s a question of response time, cost, and scope for security threats. Higher resilience can be obtained by combining cloud and on-prem protection. Businesses have to choose their threat profile and choose a security solution that provides trade-offs in performance, cost, and risk avoidance.

References:

  1. S. Munjal, P. Colaco, D. Sharma, S. Rampal, D. Ganesh, and Garima, “A novel approach for allocating resources in a multi-cloud environment,” Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manag., Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s13198-024-02691-3.
  2. W. Ahmad, A. Rasool, A. R. Javed, T. Baker, and Z. Jalil, “Cyber Security in IoT-Based Cloud Computing: A Comprehensive Survey,” Electronics, vol. 11, no. 1, Art. no. 1, Jan. 2022, doi: 10.3390/electronics11010016.
  3. M. Rahaman, C.-Y. Lin, P. Pappachan, B. B. Gupta, and C.-H. Hsu, “Privacy-Centric AI and IoT Solutions for Smart Rural Farm Monitoring and Control,” Sensors, vol. 24, no. 13, Art. no. 13, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/s24134157.
  4. J. John and E. A. Fraser, “DDoS Attacks on Cloud Computing and IoT Devices: Strategies for Mitigation,” Kasu J. Comput. Sci., vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 778–795, Dec. 2024, doi: 10.47514/kjcs/2024.1.4.006.
  5. D. M. Brandão Lent, V. G. da Silva Ruffo, L. F. Carvalho, J. Lloret, J. J. P. C. Rodrigues, and M. Lemes Proença, “An Unsupervised Generative Adversarial Network System to Detect DDoS Attacks in SDN,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 70690–70706, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3402069.
  6. Department of Management Studies, University of Kashmir, 190003, India, M. Farooq, and M. Hassan Khan, “AI-Driven Network Security: Innovations in Dynamic Threat Adaptation and Time Series Analysis for Proactive Cyber Defense,” Int. J. Wirel. Microw. Technol., vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 17–26, Apr. 2024, doi: 10.5815/ijwmt.2024.02.02.
  7. M. D. Tache (Ungureanu), O. Păscuțoiu, and E. Borcoci, “Optimization Algorithms in SDN: Routing, Load Balancing, and Delay Optimization,” Appl. Sci., vol. 14, no. 14, Art. no. 14, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.3390/app14145967.
  8. Sedik, A., Hammad, M., Abd El-Samie, F. E., Gupta, B. B., & Abd El-Latif, A. A. (2022). Efficient deep learning approach for augmented detection of Coronavirus diseaseNeural Computing and Applications, 1-18.
  9. Deveci, M., Pamucar, D., Gokasar, I., Köppen, M., & Gupta, B. B. (2022). Personal mobility in metaverse with autonomous vehicles using Q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets based OPA-RAFSI model. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems24(12), 15642-15651.
  10. Hasan A. (2023) Understanding Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) Attacks and its analysis, Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

Cite As

Bharath G. (2025) Cloud Computing vs. DDoS: Are Cloud-Based Solutions Enough? Insights2Techinfo, pp.1

83520cookie-checkCloud Computing vs. DDoS: Are Cloud-Based Solutions Enough?
Share this:

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.